Laserfiche WebLink
4.5 LEACHATE MONITORING <br /> The laboratory results for leachate monitoring well MW-2 are summarized in Table 3 and <br /> time-series concentration plots are presented in Appendix D. As shown on Table 3, no <br /> VOCs were detected in leachate monitoring well MW-2 during the monitoring period. <br /> 4.6 SURFACE-WATER MONITORING <br /> Field and laboratory results for surface-water monitoring stations (SW-1, SW-2, and <br /> SW-3) for the current monitoring period are summarized in Table 4. Stations SW-1 and <br /> SW-2 are located upstream of the landfill within the Walker and French Camp Sloughs, <br /> respectively, and are used as background sampling points, while station SW-3 is located <br /> downstream of the landfill at the confluence of the two sloughs. Water quality data from <br /> surface-water sampling stations were graphed on time-series concentration plots and are <br /> presented in Appendix D. For the surface-water monitoring stations at the French Camp <br /> Landfill, CLs are used for the WQPS. Since CLs are not provided in the WDRs,the CLs <br /> shown in Table 4 were calculated by Herst& Associates using Sanitas9, a state-approved <br /> statistical software program using historical data from background surface-water stations <br /> SW-1 and SW-2, and are presented in Appendix D. As shown in Table 4, no CLs were <br /> exceeded and no VOCs were detected in the samples collected from the surface-water <br /> stations during the monitoring period. A comparison of upgradient(SW-1 and SW-2)to <br /> downgradient(SW-3) surface-water samples indicates generally similar inorganic <br /> constituent concentrations in the upgradient and downgradient surface-water stations, <br /> suggesting that the landfill is not impacting surface water quality. <br /> Only carbonate at surface-water stations SW-1 and SW-3, and field turbidity at surface- <br /> water station SW-1 exhibit statistically significant increasing trends (Appendix D). <br /> Given that carbonate and turbidity exhibit statistically significant increasing trends at <br /> background surface-water point SW-1, these increasing trends are unlikely to be <br /> indicative of an impact from the landfill. <br /> Stream gauging was performed on February 10, and April 20, 2012 at monitoring points <br /> SG-1 and SG-2 and the data is summarized in Table 5. As shown in Figure 1, monitoring <br /> point SG-1 is located upgradient in the Walker Slough and monitoring point SG-2 is <br /> located upgradient in the French Camp Slough. <br /> 5.0 SOIL-PORE GAS MONITORING <br /> In accordance with WDR Order No. R5-2007-0046, soil-pore gas probes are monitored <br /> semiannually using a field screening protocol, and soil-pore gas samples are only <br /> collected if field screening indicates methane concentrations greater than 2.5 percent. <br /> During the monitoring period, field screening of soil-pore gas probes was conducted on <br /> February 9, 2012. As shown on Table 6, no methane was detected in any of the soil-pore <br /> gas probes, and as a result, no samples were collected. <br /> C:\2012-0027\FC ISAl2.doc 5 Geo-Logic Associates <br />