Laserfiche WebLink
3.0 SOLID WASTE MONITORING <br /> The French Camp Landfill has been formally closed and no longer receives waste. <br /> 4.0 WATER QUALITY MONITORING <br /> 4.1 SAMPLING AND LABORATORY ANALYSES <br /> All of the groundwater and leachate monitoring wells and surface water monitoring <br /> points were sampled on February 10 and 16, 2012. Quarterly depth-to-water and stream <br /> gauging was performed on February 10, and April 20, 2012. <br /> A single sample set was collected from each sampling point(groundwater, leachate, and <br /> surface water) and analyzed by BC Laboratories for the parameters stipulated in RWQCB <br /> Order No. R5-2007-0046, as summarized in Table 1. Water quality samples were also <br /> analyzed in the field for oxidation-reduction potential, turbidity, temperature, specific <br /> conductance, and pH and these field measurements were recorded on well data sheets. <br /> The groundwater and leachate monitoring wells and surface water monitoring points <br /> were sampled by Del-Tech Geotechnical Support Services (Del-Tech) in accordance with <br /> the sampling and analysis procedures detailed in Appendix B. Well data sheets, raw <br /> laboratory data, certificates of analyses, and chain-of-custody records for the sampling <br /> program are included in Appendix C. The laboratory analyses and field results for <br /> groundwater wells and surface water sampling stations are summarized in Tables 2 <br /> through 5. <br /> 4.2 QA/QC RESULTS <br /> The quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program completed for the monitoring <br /> event included analyses of one duplicate sample and two laboratory method blanks. <br /> Laboratory method blanks were analyzed for all of the analytes included in the <br /> monitoring program. During the monitoring period, no VOCs were detected in any of the <br /> laboratory method blanks. <br /> A duplicate sample was collected from well MW-8A and was labeled MW-Duplicate. <br /> Duplicate test results are presented along with the primary data in Table 2. Comparison <br /> of the primary and duplicate sample results, when both results are measurable <br /> concentrations above the practical quantitation limit(PQL) indicates good agreement <br /> with a relative percent difference of less than 2%. Review of sampling dates and <br /> laboratory analytical certificates indicates that all of the laboratory analyses were <br /> completed within required holding times. Based on the results of the laboratory QA/QC <br /> analyses, it is concluded that generally acceptable QA/QC procedures were exercised, <br /> and the water quality samples collected from the French Camp Landfill appear to be <br /> representative of water quality at the site. <br /> CA2012-0027TFCISA12.doe 2 Geo-Logic Associates <br />