Laserfiche WebLink
• generally similar inorganic constituent concentrations. With the exception of an <br /> estimated trace-level detection of toluene in upstream station SW-1, no VOCs were <br /> detected in the surface water monitoring stations, suggesting that the landfill is not <br /> impacting surface water quality. <br /> Stream gauging was performed on March 25 and May 21, 2013, at monitoring points SG- <br /> S and SG-2 and the data is summarized in Table 5. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, <br /> monitoring point SG-1 is located upgradient in the Walker Slough and monitoring point <br /> SG-2 is located upgradient in the French Camp Slough. <br /> 5.0 SOIL-PORE GAS MONITORING <br /> In accordance with WDR Order No. R5-2007-0046, soil-pore gas probes are monitored <br /> semiannually using a field screening protocol, and soil-pore gas samples are only <br /> collected if field screening indicates methane concentrations greater than 2.5 percent. <br /> During the monitoring period, field screening of soil-pore gas probes was conducted on <br /> March 26, 2013. As shown on Table 6, methane was not detected in any of the soil-pore <br /> gas probes, and as a result, no samples were collected. <br /> 6.0 CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN <br /> During the first quarter 2013 monitoring period, groundwater, leachate, and surface water <br /> samples from the French Camp Landfill were analyzed for the five-year COCs listed in <br /> RWQCB Order No. R5-2007-0046 and are summarized in Tables 2, 3, and 4. As shown <br /> in Tables 2 and 3, with the exception of one semi-VOC (dimethyl phthalate)that was <br /> detected in samples at both upgradient and downgradient monitoring wells, no organic <br /> COCs were detected in the groundwater or leachate monitoring water samples. Generally <br /> similar concentrations of diethyl phthalate, which is used in insect repellant, were <br /> measured in the upgradient and downgradient samples. Accordingly, it is believed that <br /> the source of this constituent is from agricultural activities upgradient of the landfill. For <br /> surface water samples (Table 4), 2,4-D (herbicide) was detected in samples from both <br /> upstream and downstream surface water samples and dimethoate (insecticide) was <br /> detected in upstream surface water samples. Since these constituents were measured at <br /> the highest concentrations in upstream surface water samples, their presence is believed <br /> to be related to agricultural activities upgradient of the landfill. No other organic COCs <br /> were detected in surface water samples. <br /> Several inorganic COCl were detected in both upgradient/upstream and <br /> downgradient/downstream monitoring wells and surface water stations. The similarity in <br /> the concentrations in both upgradient and downgradient wells and surface water stations <br /> suggest that the inorganic COCs are naturally occurring. However,cyanide was not <br /> detected in the samples from surface water monitoring stations SW-1 and SW-2, though a <br /> quantifiable concentration of cyanide was measured in the sample from downstream <br /> surface water station SW-3. Cyanide will be retested at surface water station SW-3 and <br /> reported in the July-December 2013 monitoring report. <br /> • <br /> C:\2013-002AFC ISA13.doc 5 Geo-Logic Associates <br />