ARCHIVED REPORTS_2013_1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

v.9.2.17 nla.UG v.9,2.17 nla.UG Within Limit Tolerance Limit Within Limit Tolerance Limit Interwelf Non-parametric Interwell Non-parametric 90 3000 72 2400 54 I a 1800 E Limn=78 ,00 Limit=2200 36 1200 ♦ i' T 18 600 T 4 0 0 5/13/05 10/30/06 4/18/08 10/5/09 3/25/11 9/11/12 5/18/90 11/3/94 4/21/99 10/8/03 3/25/08 9/11/12 Non-parametric test used in lieu of parametric tolerance limit because the Shapiro Wilk normality test showed the data Non-parametric test used in lieu of parametric tolerance limit because the Chi Squared normality test showed the data to be non-normal at the 0.01 alpha level. Most recent observation is compared with limit. Limit is highest of 42 to be non-normal at the 0.01 alpha level. Most recent observation is compared with limit. Limit is highest of 134 background values. 89.65%coverage at alpha=0.01; 93.16%coverage at alpha=0.05; 98.24%coverage at background values. 96.68%coverage at alpha=0.01; 97.85%coverage at alpha=0.05; 99.41%coverage at alpha=0.5. Report alpha=0.116. After outlier removal distribution was non-normal,so outlier results were alpha=0.5. Report alpha=0.001035. After outlier removal distribution was non-normal,so outlier resufts were invalidated. invalidated. Constituent:Sodium Dissolved Analysis Run 10/4/2012 10:00 AM Constituent:Specific Conductance[Field] Analysis Run 10/4/2012 10:00 AM Facility:French Camp LF Client:French Camp LF Data File:FRENCHIN Facility:French Camp LF Client:French Camp LF Data File:FRENCHIN ".2.17 n/,.UG v,9.2.17 Ne.UG Within Limit Tolerance Limit Within Limit Tolerance Limit Interwell Non-parametric Interwell Non-parametric 200 40 160 32 T T T 120 V 24TF E Limit=95 Limit=30.2 0 � i 80 T 16 IV 1 I 40 8 0 0 11/18/93 8/23/97 5/28/01 3/3/05 12/6/08 9/11/12 5/18/90 11/3/94 4/21/99 10/8/03 3/25/08 9/11/12 Non-parametric test used in lieu of parametric tolerance limit because the Chi Squared normality test showed the data Non-parametric test used in lieu of parametric tolerance limit because the Chi Squared normality test showed the data to be non-normal at the 0.01 alpha level. Most recent observation is compared with limit. Limit is highest of 132 to be non-normal at the 0.01 alpha level. Most recent observation is compared with limit. Limit is highest of 132 background values. 96.68%coverage at alpha=0.01; 97.85%coverage at alpha=0.05; 99.41%coverage at background values. 96.68%coverage at alpha=0.01: 97.85%coverage at alpha=0.05; 99.41%coverage at alpha=0.5. Report alpha=0.001147. After outlier removal distribution was non-normal,so outlier results were alpha=0.5. Report alpha=0.001147. After outlier removal distribution was non-normal,so outlier results were invalidated. invalidated. 4ls.s Constituent:Sulfate as SO4 Analysis Run 10/4/2012 10:00AM Constituent:Temperature 0/4/2012 10:00 AM Facility:French Camp LF Client:French Camp LF Date File:FRENCHIN Facility:French Camp LF ClientF Data File:FRENCHIN HERST & ASSOCIATES, INC.""