Laserfiche WebLink
upstream of the landfill within the Walker and French Camp Sloughs (respectively) and <br /> are used as background sampling points. Station SW-3 is located downstream of the <br /> landfill at the confluence of the two sloughs. A comparison of upgradient(SW-1 and <br /> SW-2)to downgradient(SW-3) surface water samples indicates generally similar <br /> inorganic constituent concentrations.With the exception of an estimated trace-level <br /> detection of toluene in upstream station SW-1,no VOCs were detected in the surface <br /> water monitoring stations, suggesting that the landfill is not impacting surface water <br /> quality. As presented in Table 4, the retest sample collected for cyanide in well SW-3 did <br /> not confirm the presence of cyanide as a new constituent of concern and no further action <br /> is necessary. <br /> Stream gauging was performed on August 5 and November 29, 2013, at monitoring <br /> points SG-1 and SG-2 and the data is summarized in Table 5. As shown in Figures 1 and <br /> 2, monitoring point SG-1 is located upgradient in the Walker Slough and monitoring <br /> point SG-2 is located upgradient in the French Camp Slough. <br /> 5.0 SOIL-PORE GAS MONITORING <br /> In accordance with WDR Order No. R5-2007-0046, soil-pore gas probes are monitored <br /> semiannually using a field screening protocol, and soil-pore gas samples are only <br /> collected if field screening indicates methane concentrations greater than 2.5 percent. <br /> During the monitoring period, field screening of soil-pore gas probes was conducted on <br /> August 6, 2013. As shown on Table 6, methane was not detected in any of the soil-pore <br /> gas probes, and as a result, no samples were collected. <br /> 6.0 ANNUAL SUMMARY <br /> 6.1 GENERAL <br /> During the 2013 monitoring year, groundwater elevation measurements were performed <br /> quarterly and water quality sampling and soil-pore gas monitoring were performed <br /> semiannually in accordance with WDR Order No. R5-2007-0046. All of the monitoring <br /> points were sampled for the monitoring parameters summarized in Table 1. Time-series <br /> plots depicting groundwater and surface water constituent concentrations are presented in <br /> Appendix D and a tabular summary of the historical monitoring data is presented in an <br /> electronic format in Appendix C. Stiff diagrams of the semiannual data obtained in 2013, <br /> hydrographs illustrating the historical groundwater elevations of the detection monitoring <br /> wells, and information relative to well screen elevations and pump intake elevations are <br /> included in Appendix D. <br /> 6.2 GROUNDWATER <br /> Over the 2013 monitoring year, groundwater elevations varied by about one to two feet <br /> with a gradient between 0.001 to 0.004 ft/ft to the south to southeast. <br /> C:\2013A02MC2SA13.doc 5 Geo-Logic Associates <br />