Laserfiche WebLink
•.r <br /> AOL <br /> Monitoring Report Compliance Checklist 4 <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs u. Is there a summary of the monitoring <br /> Standard results indicating any changes made <br /> Provisions or observed since the previous annual <br /> (1993,1997,2000) report? <br /> v. Is there an evaluation of the <br /> effectiveness of the leachate <br /> monitoring/control facilities? <br /> Standard w. Is there a discussion about the <br /> Provisions annual LCRS testing and a <br /> (April 2000) comparison to earlier testing? <br /> or check WDRs <br /> Violations Noted? (check one) Yes No x <br /> If Yes, check all issues that apply and provide comments: <br /> Incomplete transmittal letter Comments (to be entered into SWIM <br /> Incomplete report <br /> Inadequate monitoring program <br /> New release <br /> Inadequate response to evidence of a release <br /> WDRs violation other than listed above <br /> Other(explain in comments) <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> Not necessary to include blank SMR checklist in SMRs. <br /> lst Q=Figures 1&2 missing. <br /> 1 St Q GW quality=hexavalent chromium trace in MW-3 &MW-4. Continue monitoring to develop background water <br /> quality. Chloride exceeded in S-2,however same as S-1 upstream. Xylene trace in MW-2. No retest performed. <br /> 2nd Q GW quality= 1,2 Dichloropropane(trace) and tetrachloroethene in MW-1 (upgradient well). Retested on 2 July <br /> 2002. Waiting for results. <br /> pH meter found to be misfunctioning during 4t"Q monitoring. IT sampler(Paul Weinhardt), should report that <br /> equipment is calibrated on field data sheets prior to each sampling event at each landfill. <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> J <br /> Date: <br />