Laserfiche WebLink
ar <br /> Monitoring Report Compliance c.; ecklist 4 <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs u. Is there a summary of the monitoring X Changes have occurred,but not <br /> Standard results indicating any changes made significant based on statistical <br /> Provisions or observed since the previous annual analysis per County. <br /> (1993,1997,2000) report? <br /> X <br /> v. Is there an evaluation of the <br /> effectiveness of the leachate <br /> monitoring/control facilities? <br /> X <br /> Standard w. Is there a discussion about the <br /> Provisions annual LCRS testing and a <br /> (April 2000) comparison to earlier testing? <br /> or check WDRs <br /> Violations Noted? (check one) Yes No x <br /> If Yes, check all issues that apply and provide comments: <br /> Incomplete transmittal letter Comments (to be entered into SWIM): <br /> Incomplete report <br /> Inadequate monitoring program <br /> New release <br /> Inadequate response to evidence of a release <br /> WDRs violation other than listed above <br /> Other(explain in comments) - <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> Comment m=pH changes indicating sampling error. Provide explanation and corrective action. <br /> Hexavalent chromium detected in MW-3 and MW-4. County states from natural sources. Hexavalent chromium <br /> normally not naturally occurring. EPA Method 7199 (ion chromatography) should be used instead of EPA 7196 <br /> (colorimetric)for hexavalent chromium per Board review comments of 1 February 2002(3'd Qtr review). SAP does <br /> not show update. See SW-826 for details of differences in analytical methods. <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> Date: <br /> 0Z i <br />