My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1993-2007
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
3242
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440068
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1993-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2021 2:45:06 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:10:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1993-2007
RECORD_ID
PR0440068
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0001871
FACILITY_NAME
CALIFORNIA CLAY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
3242
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17702029
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3242 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sfrench
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4434_PR0440068_3242 S EL DORADO_1993-2007.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I V. Surface Conditi IV <br /> A. Is site access adequately restricted? (9/N) <br /> B. Is the waste adequately covered to prevent human contact? <br /> C Is the final drainage system for the site adequate to prevent erosion? <br /> &N) <br /> D. Is the finalgrading adequate to promote run-off? (Y/N) ("/Y (004", <br /> E. Are slopes greater than 3:1 (33% or 18 degrees)?ON) <br /> F. Are slopes greater than 1.75:1 (57% or 30 degrees)? <br /> V. Postclosure Land Use <br /> h, <br /> A. Has the land use of the site significantly changed since closure? <br /> �Y& <br /> If yes, include or reference site improvement plans and answer the following: <br /> 1. Give the date that the improvements were constructed <br /> 2. Have the improvements compromised the integrity of the final <br /> cover? (Y/N/NA) <br /> 3. Has differential settlement affected the improvements? (Y/N) <br /> B. Is there a proposed change in postclosure land use that may jeopardize <br /> the integrity of previously closed sites or pose a potential threat to public <br /> health and safety or the environment? (Y/N) <br /> If yes, briefly describe the proposed project: <br /> C. Is there a postclosure land use tracking system? (Y/N) <br /> If yes, describe tracking system: <br /> V1. Disposal Site Priority (See Prioritizatior, Chart) <br /> A1: A2:—A 3: B1: B2:—B 3: C1: C2:—C 3:_ D <br /> Vill. Comments <br /> PREPARED BY. DATE: <br /> COMPLIANCE BRANCH REVtW: <br /> CIWMB CLOSURE AND REMEDIATION BRANCH APPROVAL: <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> ClWMB Closure and Remediation Branch (1/25193) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.