Laserfiche WebLink
a KLEINF-ELDER ' <br /> Bright People.Fight Solutio- <br /> 1 find that the proposed project MAY have an impact on the <br /> environment that is "potentially significant' or "potentially significant <br /> unless mitigated" but at least one effect: (1) has been adequately <br /> analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal <br /> standards and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based <br /> on the earlier analysis, as described on attached sheets. An <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must <br /> analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. <br /> I find that although the proposed project could have a significant <br /> effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects <br /> (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL <br /> IMPACT REPORT or MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or <br /> mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br /> REPORT or MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including <br /> revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the project, <br /> nothing further is required. Specifically, the environmental <br /> documentation for the proposed project is provided by the following <br /> document(s): <br /> (Pursuant to the State and City Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, the <br /> determination of the Community Development Director may be appealed to the <br /> City Planning Commission by submitting a written appeal with the applicable fee to <br /> the Community Development Department within ten (10) calendar days following j <br /> this date of the determination.) i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> MICHAEL E. LOCKE, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/INTERIM COMMUNITY <br /> DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR f <br /> CITY OF STOCKTON t <br /> i <br /> i <br /> By: ,L Date: <br /> Ad4Bnuicke�T, Senlor Plann r ' <br /> i . <br /> i <br /> I <br /> 121339/STO11 8226 3-75 October 14,2011 <br /> Copyright 2011 Weinfelder <br />