Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-Environmental Protectisent;y PETE WILSON, Governor <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION 'p`I;? kt s Al <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A i pM. +` s T`4L i �hL�' <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 '. .' ';,CE " <br /> PHONE: (916)255-3000 93 Jvt hn <br /> r`l 8 !+ r <br /> FAX: (916)255-3015 f 1 J' <br /> 16 June 1993 <br /> Mr. Gabe Karam <br /> Department of Public Works <br /> County of San Joaquin <br /> 1810 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, CA 95205-6232 <br /> DRAFT EIR FOR LOVELACE TRANSFER STATION EXPANSION <br /> We have reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the <br /> expansion of Lovelace Transfer Station and are concerned about two issues <br /> regarding the project. <br /> The first issue is the discharge into the unlined retention pond. The major <br /> concern is whether or not any constituents in the facility washdown water or <br /> constituents picked up by stormwater runoff are present above designated waste <br /> levels. In our 18 May 1990 letter to your office, we stated that the County <br /> would have to determine if the discharge to the pond was a designated waste. <br /> To date, the County has not submitted a document stating the discharge is not <br /> a designated waste. <br /> In a 27 May 1993 phone conversation, you indicated that a separate tank would <br /> contain the facility washdown water for management at an on-site or off-site <br /> treatment facility. Therefore, only stormwater runoff will be discharged into <br /> the retention pond. The County still needs to determine if the stormwater <br /> discharge is a designated waste. We would also like to see the plans for the <br /> collection and treatment system for the washdown water. <br /> The second issue is the disturbance of an old existing landfill at the site. <br /> Our office was unaware that this landfill existed. The County's proposed <br /> mitigation is to remove all wastes within five feet of the proposed structure <br /> as recommended in the 7 January 1993 Kleinfelder geotechnical report and take <br /> these wastes to an approved landfill . The Draft EIR was not specific as to <br /> the volume of waste to be removed from the site. The County should send a <br /> letter to us stating the volume and description of the waste and which <br /> landfill received the wastes. <br /> At this time, we will not write waste discharge requirements for the expansion <br /> of the Lovelace Transfer Station. However, if future information indicates <br /> that waste discharge requirements are necessary, we will request a Report of <br /> Waste Discharge for the facility. <br />