My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOVELACE
>
2323
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440013
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:10 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:15:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1993_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440013
PE
4445
FACILITY_ID
FA0001434
FACILITY_NAME
LOVELACE TRANSFER STATION
STREET_NUMBER
2323
STREET_NAME
LOVELACE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20406020
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2323 LOVELACE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4445_PR0440013_2323 LOVELACE_1993_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix E <br /> TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION TECHNICAL DATA <br /> LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPT <br /> Level of Service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort <br /> (including such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped <br /> delay, and impediments caused by other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel <br /> through an intersection or roadway segment. Six grades are used to denote the various <br /> LOS from A to F. <br /> A. Signalized Intersections <br /> The six LOS grades are described qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table E-1. <br /> Additionally,Table E-2 identifies the relationship between level of service and average <br /> stopped delay per vehicle. Using this definition, a "D" LOS is generally considered to <br /> represent the minimum acceptable design standard. <br /> B. Unsignalized Intersections <br /> The calculation of LOS at an unsignalized intersection requires a different approach. <br /> The 1985 Highway Capacity Manual includes a methodologgyy for calculating the LOS at <br /> two-way stop-controIled intersections. For these unsignalized intersections,LOS is <br /> defined differently than for signalized intersections in that it is based upon the concept <br /> of"Reserve Capacity" (i.e.,that portion of available hourly capacity that is not used). A <br /> qualitative description of the various service levels associated with an unsignalized <br /> intersection is presented in Table -3. A uantitative definition of LOS for a <br /> unsignalized intersection is presented in Table . <br /> The reserve capacity concept applies only to an individual traffic movement or to <br /> shared lane movements. Once the capacity of all the individual movements has been <br /> calculated and their LOS and expected delays determined, an overall evaluation of the <br /> intersection can be made. Normally,the movement having the worst LOS defines the <br /> overall evaluation,but this may be tempered by engineering judgment. An"E"LOS is <br /> generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design standard. <br /> It should be noted that the Draft Traffic Impact Study guidelines has differing levels of <br /> LOS for the minimum acceptable design standard for all intersections (both signalized <br /> and unsignalized) depending upon the relative contribution of project traffic to the <br /> signal warrant. <br /> Past experience with the unsignalized analysis procedure indicates this methodology is <br /> very conservative in that it tends to overestimate the magnitude of any potential <br /> for <br /> that might exist. This is especially true for minor street left turn movements. <br /> For example, thelighway Capacity Manual methodology does not take into account the <br /> effects of vehicle flow platoons that result from upstream signalization. Vehicles <br /> traveling in platoons tend to create greater gaps in the traffic flow that sometimes <br /> provide additional capacity for the side closest to the signal. Therefore, the results of <br /> any unsignalized intersection analysis should be reviewed with this thought in mind. <br /> Generally,LOS E for the minor street left turn movement is considered to be acceptable <br /> for an unsignalized intersection, although it also indicates that the need for <br /> signalization should be investigated. <br /> E-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.