COMPLIANCE INFO_1980-1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'UR4,p C. ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNI CANCE CHECKLIST (Completed v City Staff) This checklist shall be completed, and/or independently reviewed and authorized, by the City of Stockton Community Development Department/Planning Division pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines,Section 15063. The following questions are intended to provide a brief environmental evaluation of the proposed project in order to identify any potentially significant adverse environmental impacts which may be caused by the project or which may affect the project site. For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that any feasible mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study,which have been agreed to pursuant to a"Mitigation Agreement"with the City of Stockton,will be incorporated into the project. In the first assessment category, "Potentially Si ng ificant", a "No" response indicates that the project (with mitigation measures, if applicable) will not have, or be subject to any significant effects on the environment. A"Yes" response indicates that the project may/wiil have a significant adverse effect either directly or indirectly,even if partially mitigated. in the second category,"Mitication Incorporated",a"Yes"response indicates that the project will fully or partially mitigate any adverse effects by incorporating proposed and/or required mitigation measures. A"No" response indicates that mitigation measures have not been agreed to,are infeasible,or are not necessary. A narrative discussion of all"Yes"responses and any clarifications to"No"responses and/or the scope of work for an EIR, if required,shall be provided in the section following this checklist (Section D-"Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures and/or EIR Scone of Work"). ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Potentially Mitigation Significant Incorporated Yes No Yes No 1. EARTH: Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions,displacements,compaction,or over covering of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction,covering,or modification or any unique geologic or physical X features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands,or changes in siltation, X deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides,ground failure,or similar hazards? X 2. AIR: Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air(local short-tern and/or regional long-term impacts)? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X X C. Volation of any ambient air quality standard, substantial contribution to an existing or projected air quality violation,or exposure of sensitive receptors X to substantial pollutant concentrations? 7