My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1992-2003
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MACARTHUR
>
30703
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0505006
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1992-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2022 3:53:47 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:16:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1992-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0505006
PE
4445
FACILITY_ID
FA0006475
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY MATERIAL RECOVERY/TRANSF
STREET_NUMBER
30703
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MACARTHUR
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25313019
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
30703 S MACARTHUR DR
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4445_PR0505006_30703 S MACARTHUR_1992-1997.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> LEA Advisory #22 <br /> June T,1`l095 f <br /> Page 2 <br /> there is a unique set of circumstances which will determine the appropriate method to reach CEQA <br /> compliance. <br /> Changes and Existing CEQA Documents <br /> In some situations there may be existing CEQA documentation, such as an Environmental Impact <br /> Report (EIR), a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), or a Negative Declaration (ND) that <br /> adequately addresses the environmental concerns associated with the proposed changes. Only after <br /> carefully comparing the project description in the environmental document with the proposed changes, <br /> should it be determined that the analysis in the existing document adequately addresses or evaluates <br /> the effects associated with the changes. <br /> If a previously developed document is being used to support the changes, the specific requirements to <br /> determine its adequacy are detailed in CEQA Guideline §15162 (Refer to the attachment for the full <br /> text of CCR §15162). In summary the criteria are as follows; <br /> ■ Substantial changes in the project , <br /> ■ Substantial changes to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, <br /> ■ New information of substantial importance. <br /> If a subsequent document is not required, an addendum to an existing document may be necessary. <br /> An addendum would be used to make minor changes or additions to the original environmental <br /> document. An addendum should be developed only if the criteria requiring subsequent documentation <br /> are found not to be applicable. CEQA Guideline §15164 describes aspects associated with an <br /> addendum (Refer to the attachment for the full text of CCR §15164). <br /> Lead and Resnonsible Agencies <br /> The Lead Agency is usually the agency with the first approval and/or broadest approval over a project <br /> (i.e. land use permit). If a public agency is carrying out a project they can be Lead Agency (i.e. an <br /> expansion of a county operated landfill). A Responsible Agency has a secondary and/or a more <br /> limited approval. There may be situations when a Responsible Agency may need to be the Lead <br /> Agency for a project. An example of how this might occur for a solid waste facility project is when <br /> a planning department determines that a local use permit is not required. In this case the Local <br /> Enforcement Agency (LEA) may find that they have the first and/or broadest approval over the <br /> project and would need to act as Lead Agency. <br /> Changes and CEQA Exemption(s) <br /> A lead agency may find that a change is exempt from CEQA analysis (See CEQA Guidelines §15061, <br /> and §15300 - §15329 regarding exemptions). The exemption determination and the supporting <br /> analysis leading to this determination must be included in the permit package submitted to CIWMB. <br /> The proposed Notice of Exemption, or the equivalent (for example a letter or memo containing <br /> information detailed in §15062(a](1,2,and 3]), should be used for this purpose. Please be advised that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.