My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1991-2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440074
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1991-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2021 10:26:30 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:19:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1991-2006
RECORD_ID
PR0440074
PE
4461
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sfrench
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4461_PR0440074_2450 W YOSEMITE_.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
413
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.a <br /> 9 <br /> CITY OF MANTECA -2- 4 January 1994 <br /> LAND SPREADING OPERATIONS <br /> this inspection the regional board staff has not yet assigned the locations for the storm water <br /> runoff/irrigation monitoring points, R-1 and R-2 for the sludge spreading operations. The WDRs <br /> Monitoring and Reporting Program indicate that R-1 is a point in the irrigation return recycling system. <br /> My interpretation of R-1 monitoring point will be the discharge side of the agricultural water return <br /> pumps used during the growing season. R-2 would be most down gradient point in the San Joaquin <br /> Irrigation District Drainage Ditch/Canal prior to leaving Manteca's fields. Should constituents be <br /> detected above water quality objectives at R-2, then additional analyses will have to be performed <br /> upgradient in the drainage canal to determine whether or not Manteca's fields are the source. <br /> INSPECTION SUMMARY: <br /> No apparent violations of the WDRs were seen at the time of my inspection. However, the City of <br /> Manteca must demonstrate that the increased sludge loading and change in the crop grown, will not <br /> result in the agronomic use of the available nitrogen from being exceeded on the field; both by the <br /> sludge alone and then when the effluent is applied to it. It appears monitoring of the San Joaquin <br /> County Irrigation Drainage Canal has not yet occurred in accordance with the WDRs and must begin <br /> immediately. Monitoring points R-1 and R-2 had not yet been defined for the sludge application <br /> operations. This inspection report establishes the monitoring points R-1 and R-2. <br /> W- - w6t"Lr <br /> MICHAEL MOSBACHER, Project Engineer <br /> 1 Per phone conversation on 27 December 1993 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.