Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> (3) and (4) <br /> The site drainage plan has been designed to control runoff the net average <br /> r precipitation in December, January, and February (5.67 inches), which is <br /> greater than the 25-year, 24-hour storm, which involves 2.28 inches of precipi- <br /> tation. Assuming 5.67 inches of precipitation over 33.23 acres of land, which <br /> r a runoff coefficient of 1.0 results in a total volume of 5,100,000 gallons. See <br /> the calculations in Appendix 4 for Runoff Retention Basin Sizing. The runoff <br /> would contain floatables and sediment from the compost areas and other areas <br /> of the site. The retention pond will allow sediments to settle out and will <br /> incorporate a removal of floatables. <br /> r Physical Site Conditions <br /> Continental Sediment Sequence. The Great Valley in the area around Stockton was <br /> uplifted at the end of the Eocene and was eventually cut off from the Pacific Ocean on the <br /> west by subduction and/or accretion events that uplifted or emplaced the present day Coast <br /> Ranges. Sediments derived from the eroding Sierra Nevada in the east and the Coast <br /> r Ranges in the west were deposited in the Great Valley by rivers and streams from about <br /> 35 million years ago to the present. In the vicinity of Forward, the marine sediments are <br /> generally overlain by approximately 2,500 feet of unconsolidated Tertiary and Quaternary <br /> r sediments of (from oldest to youngest) the Valley springs, Mehrten, Laguna, and Victor <br /> Formations. Sediments of these formations were deposited by the activity of the major <br /> streams in this area that meandered across the valley floor. <br /> rThe most recent deposit, the Victor Formation, is typically heterogeneous and laterally and <br /> vertically discontinuous, which is indicative of a fluvial depositional environment. The <br /> Victor Formation is generally coarse grained but slightly clayey in the interfan sediment <br /> areas in the vicinity of Forward. In this area, the Victor Formation is approximately <br /> 100 feet thick. <br /> rSite Geology. Site geology has been compiled from subsurface information provided on <br /> lithologic logs of soil borings and monitoring wells drilled during previous investigations. <br /> rMost of the boring information is clustered in the northern area of the site along the access <br /> road and in the southern area around Monitoring Well 5 (MW-5). Fence diagrams and two <br /> geologic cross sections were drawn for the site and are illustrated on Drawing 2 (Klein- <br /> felder 1991) and Drawing 3 (Beta Associates 1987), respectively. Overall, the northern <br /> and southern areas of the site are geologically comparable. For clarity, Drawing 2 does <br /> not include all of the borings available on the Fence Diagrams. The location and orienta- <br /> tion of the cross sections taken are indicated in plan on Drawing 1. <br /> In general, geology at the site is characterized by finely bedded silty, clayey, or sandy <br /> materials. Most of the beds are highly variable and discontinuous over distance. This <br /> variability is probably the result of deposition in a fluvial environment where the river is <br /> r variable in its course. The sediments observed appear to correspond with the description <br /> of Pleistocene-aged sediments of the Victor Formation. <br /> rwa10029B64.wp5/38 <br /> 9ns/9a 38 <br /> 1 <br />