Laserfiche WebLink
Historical Background <br /> AGE-NC Project No 99-0559 <br /> IPage 2 of 4 <br />' Laboratory analysis of ground water samples collected from two monitoring wells on the northern <br /> and eastern property boundaries appeared to show that dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons extent off- <br /> site The vertical and lateral extent of impacted ground water at the site was not defined,further more <br /> increasing concentrations of dissolved hydrocarbons in the ground water monitoring wells indicate <br /> off-site migration of contaminants The mass of dissolved hydrocarbons and MTBE is significant <br /> and required off-site assessment and immediate interim remediation <br /> IIn April 2001 three paired soil borings (CPT-1, CPT-2 and CPT-3)were advanced on-site, at each <br /> boring location, lithologic data was collected from the initial CPT boring, then an immediately <br /> I adjacent twin boring was advanced to collect grab groundwater samples from selected depths Soil <br /> borings CPT-1, CPT-2 and CPT-3 were advanced vertically to maximum depths of approximately <br /> 155 feet below surface grade(bsg), 162 feet bsg and 158 feet bsg,respectively CPT 1 was advanced <br />' at the western edge of the site, CPT2 was advanced adjacent to the UST release, and CPT3 was <br /> advanced along the southern edge of the site <br /> IGenerally, the subsurface of the site is comprised of alternating thick intervals of fine-grained <br /> material and thin to thick coarse-grained units Based on the CPT data, AGE identified six <br /> . hydrogeologic units (HU1 through HU6), defined as bodies of rock or sediment that has <br />' hydrogeologic characteristics(i e hydraulic conductivity,pore pressure,etc )that make them distinct <br /> from surrounding bodies of rock or sediment(Sanders, 1998),or a part of a body of rock that forms <br />' a distinct hydrologic unit with respect to the flow of ground water(Maxey, 1964) <br /> HU1 was impacted by TPH-g,benzene and MTBE in the former UST area and only by MTBE south <br />' and west of the former UST area HU4, a thick poorly graded sand to silty sand layer encountered <br /> at approximately 92 to 105 feet bsg which was a significant unit of concern,was impacted by TPH-g, <br /> benzene and MTBE in the former UST area and toward the west and was slightly impacted by <br />' MTBE(<5 0 µg/1)south of the former UST area The upper HU5 (130 feet bsg)was impacted in the <br /> former UST area by TPH-g, benzene and MTBE, but was less impacted south of the former UST <br /> area (TPH-g <100 gg/1), and not impacted west and down-gradient of the former UST area The <br />' lower HU5, at 150 feet, was significantly impacted by TPH-g, benzene and MTBE in the former <br /> UST area,yet was not impacted by TPH-g and BTEX south or west of the former UST HU5 at 150 <br /> feet was slightly impacted by MTBE (<5 0 gg/1) south of the former UST area <br />' The vertical extent of dissolved TPH-g and benzene does not extend to 130 feet bsg in the area of <br /> CPT-1 or to 60 feet bsg in the area of CPT-3 The vertical extent of dissolved TPH-g and benzene <br />' has not been determined in the area of CPT-2, adjacent to the former UST area and extends to the <br /> lower HU5 at 150 feet bsg Dissolved MTBE does not extend vertically to 130 feet bsg in the area <br /> of CPT-1 The vertical extent of dissolved MTBE has not been determined in the areas of borings <br />' CPT-2 and CPT-3 The concentrations of dissolved MTBE detected in the former UST area increases <br /> . with depth, and highest MTBE detection in bonng CPT2, the former UST area, was in the sample <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />