Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 11 February 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 99-0559 <br />' Page 7 of 10 <br /> Hydrological Unit 2 (HU2) extends from 62 to 67 feet bsg, is predominantly fine grained, but is <br /> coarse locally, and is characterized by high pore pressure <br />' Hydrological Unit 3 (HU3)extends from 67 feet to 92 feet bsg,is predominantly coarse grained,but <br /> with significant interval of fine grained soil, the volume of fine grained soil increases toward the <br /> south The zone Is characterized by very moderate to low pore pressure <br /> tHydrological Unit 4 (HU4) extends from 92 feet to 105 feet bsg and consists primarily of coarse <br /> grained soil which is gravelly toward the north, toward the south the unit is thinner and contains <br />' more fine soil HU4 is characterized by very low to low pore pressure <br /> Hydrological Unit 5 (HU5) extends from 105 to and possibly beyond 155 feet bsg near the total <br />' depth penetrated by all three CPT bonngs Silt and clay are the dominant soil type in the interval, <br /> although sand occurs locally The various soil types do not appear to have great lateral continuity <br />' The interval is characterized by pore pressure variations from moderate to high pressures that do not <br /> appear to have great lateral continuity Locally, thin intervals of low to moderate pore pressure <br /> material occurs <br /> 10 Boring logs from the Western Farm Service (UNOCAL) site east of the subject site show the <br /> subsurface soil to increase in sand and gravel content and thickness This is probably due to the <br /> increasing volume of channel deposits of the nearby Calaveras River <br /> 3 3 LABORATORY RESULTS OF "GRAB" GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> A total of eleven"grab"ground water samples were collected from CPT-1, CPT-2 and CPT-3 and <br /> submitted for laboratory analysis for the above mentioned constituents Two grab water samples <br /> were collected from HU1 (CPT1-60 and CPT3-60), three grab water samples were collected from <br /> HU4(CPT1-100 CPT2-100 and CPT3-100),three grab water samples were collected from the upper <br />' portion of HU5 (CPT1-130,CPT2-130 and CPT3-130),and three grab water samples were collected <br /> from the lower portion of HU5 (CPT1-150, CPT2-150 and CPT3-150) Table 1 shows the sample <br /> identification, sampling depth and the associated informal hydrologic unit designation <br /> TPH- was not detected in HU1 samples collected from CPT and CPT3 HU1 was not sampled in <br /> g P ( p <br /> boring CPT2) TPH-g was detected in HU3 samples collected from CPT1 and CPT2 at <br /> concentrations of 6,700 µg/1 and 710 µg/l, respectively TPH-g was detected in the upper HU5 <br /> sample collected from CPT2 at a concentration of 4,700 pg/l and in the lower HU5 sample at a <br /> concentration of 10,000 µg/1 <br /> iBTEX compounds were detected in the HU4 sample collected from CPT1 at concentrations of <br /> I1,100 µg/1, 89 µg/1,41 Ogg/l and 900µg/1,respectively BTEX compounds were detected in the HU4 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />