My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
2701
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0540315
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2020 11:01:09 AM
Creation date
7/7/2020 10:52:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0540315
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0023046
FACILITY_NAME
U-HAUL FACILITY NO 710050
STREET_NUMBER
2701
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
11708014
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2701 N WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 4 <br /> Even with Ca Resolution #2009-0042 that reduced GROUNDWATER monitoring-sampling- <br /> reporting to semi-annual, stipulations for new wells, special wells, etc, were made to keep <br /> them quarterly. The resolution did not affect REMEDIAL monitoring-reporting. <br /> Until it can be shown that less frequent reporting for a remedial action is warranted, the EHD <br /> will require quarterly reports on the remedial action to be submitted to Geotracker (in a timely <br /> manner). <br /> You should know, the reg agency MUST be advise any time a remedial system is turned off for <br /> a significant time. Typical/routine maintenance actions are exempt from this notification, <br /> unless repairs/parts needs are extensive. D/C of a system/unit w/o regulatory approval places <br /> your RP in a possible 'non-compliance' status, which could cause more problems. <br /> As for a SCM, typically the EHD requires one of these updated/submitted any time significant <br /> feild work redefines the plume characterization as the site prepares for remedial action <br /> implementation. Once a site is IN remediation, most of, if not all of, the data we need is <br /> included in a Status report....whether quarterly or semi annually submitted. <br /> contrary to some, the EHD does take into consideration the logic of lesser reports on stable, <br /> non-modified remedial systems. If you can support conditions (trends over time are very <br /> supportive), and you feel less report submittal is applicable, then by all means, request a <br /> change. <br /> just keep the EHD in the loop on all changes for this site. <br /> as for this site, all 33 wells are on semi annual. So within 15 days of the ending of the semi- <br /> annual period, the report should be on GT. Additionally, the Geo_Well (DTW sheet) and the <br /> laboratory data (EDF) for this same period should be submitted to GT. In order to meet the 15 <br /> day period, we strongly recommend you don't wait till the END of the semi annual period to <br /> START your sampling. with six months in a semi annual period, doing the sample collection <br /> should take place in the first half of it. this allows you cheaper lab turnaround times and your <br /> company more time to generate the report. THIS is what should be for all previous periods. <br /> The resolution took affect around Summer 2009. after this I'm looking for semi annual <br /> submittals. before this, I'm looking for 4 quarters per year for EDFs, Geo-Wells, and QMRs... <br /> The remedial status report is to include most of the things about the system/site that a person <br /> NOT familiar with the site, could read and understand what's going on. Additionally, op times, <br /> influent-effluent data, repair history as well as standard maps, site history, and <br /> CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS for future/next reporting period are to be <br /> included. Currently, this report is due on GT within 15 days of the end of the quarter. Again, <br /> good plan ning/prethought, allows for timely uploads. If you're planning on requesting a <br /> reduction, be prepared to support with historical data that shows a trend. <br /> just imagine you are the regulator or the DTSC or EPA reviewer. What would you like to see in <br /> this, one of many reports your read, so that you have a pretty secure feeling on what's going <br /> on there. <br /> more questions? <br /> let me know. <br /> 7/30/2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.