My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012665
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
2701
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0540315
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012665
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2020 11:07:13 AM
Creation date
7/7/2020 10:58:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012665
RECORD_ID
PR0540315
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0023046
FACILITY_NAME
U-HAUL FACILITY NO 710050
STREET_NUMBER
2701
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
11708014
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2701 N WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> e:a <br /> Mal <br /> ' E <br /> upward migration of volatiles from the central <br /> plume. <br /> b) Soil contamination found at MW-1 and MW-2 is minor <br /> and might be attributed to the upward migration of <br /> volatile contaminants from the groundwater <br /> contamination plume. Therefore, MW-1 and MW-2 do <br /> not appear to transect the primary soil <br /> contamination plume, and those locaticns will be <br /> useful for any necessary future soil plume <br /> definition. <br /> c) The shallow groundwater underlying the Site has <br /> been impacted by gasoline constituents. Gasoline <br /> contamination was confirmed to be present in each <br /> of the three on-site monitoring wells. <br /> Based on the findings, field observations and analytical <br /> results, ETS makes the following .recommendations; <br /> 1) Further definition will be necessary to determine <br /> the areal extents of soil and groundwater. <br /> > contamination at the Site. <br /> 2) The three existing monitoring wells should be <br /> sampled on a quarterly basis to check for changes in <br /> i ' . contamination levels. The groundwater gradient and <br /> flow direction should also be calculated quarterly <br /> to indicate any possible changes in contaminant <br /> —� r migratory paths. <br /> 3) The highest groundwater contamination levels were <br /> found at monitoring well 1 which is apparently up- <br /> gradient from the former UST pit and product lines. <br /> Therefore, a monitoring well should be placed <br /> further up-gradient (in the direction of MW-1) from <br /> the former UST pit. <br /> This additional well would be useful in the <br /> verification of whether the contamination at MW-1 is <br /> possibly coming from an off-site source. <br /> ETS ENVIRONMENTAL & ASSOC. <br /> PRUJ::CT 305, PAGE 12 <br /> i> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.