My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007205
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
2701
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0540315
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2020 3:00:24 PM
Creation date
7/7/2020 2:32:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007205
RECORD_ID
PR0540315
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0023046
FACILITY_NAME
U-HAUL FACILITY NO 710050
STREET_NUMBER
2701
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
11708014
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2701 N WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> 50TA F. <br /> Environmental Technology Inc — <br /> zo <br /> However, this high concentration of TPH-g found at MW-4 (i e , an eight (8) fold <br /> increase), has never been evidenced at MW-4, in the past <br /> Based on the general increase in concentrations found at all five monitoring <br /> wells, with the exception of MW-3, the question is raised regarding the <br /> unknown source(s) of contamination Taking into account that the historical <br /> groundwater flow direction has been in the directions west, northwest to north, <br /> it may be possible that a contaminant plume is corning on-site from an <br /> unknown off-site source(s) The evidence of MW-4 . which is located upgradient <br /> from the former dispensing island area, displaying very high concentrations, <br /> further suggests this possibility From Figure 3, a potential contaminant plume <br /> from off-site can be interpreted However, it should be noted that the dotted <br /> lines, do not represent actual contours they are merely possible projections of <br /> an off-site plume At this time, SOTA cannot conclusively define the off-site <br /> plume, if any, which may have impacted the U-Haul center <br /> SOTA had earlier proposed further delineation of the groundwater <br /> contamination plume as was also required by San Joaquin County SOTA <br /> submitted a workplan detailing the proposed additional site assessment on <br />' November 29, 1994 SOTA's workplan was conditionally approved by San <br /> Joaquin County in their letter dated February 3, 1995 U-Haul International <br /> has authorized SOTA to proceed with the additional site assessment <br /> investigation which will include drilling two off-site monitoring wells and one <br /> on-site monitoring well SOTA is submitting well permit applications to the San <br /> Joaquin County, Environmental Health Division for all three proposed <br /> monitoring wells After obtaining the well permits. SOTA will submit an <br /> application to the San Joaquin County, Public Works Department to obtain an <br /> Encroachment permit to drill in the County's right of way Upon obtaining the <br /> Encroachment permit, SOTA will proceed with field activities, which is <br /> anticipated in the next three to five weeks These proposed off-site monitoring <br /> wells scheduled to be installed will provide information to assist in the <br /> delineation of a potential off-site plume <br /> Should there be any questions regarding this transmittal please contact us at <br /> (619) 485-8100 <br />' Sincerely, <br /> SOTA Environmenta gy, Inc , <br /> 1 ►�u�r <br /> , <br /> AO <br /> Dakshana Mur EF7-P E Greg Alyanakian <br /> Project Manage /��p Staff Scientist <br /> O <br /> cc Doug Dunham, U- au International, Phoenix, AZ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.