Laserfiche WebLink
*N' <br /> March 30, 1995 Environmental Technology Inc <br />' Mr Michaellnfurna <br /> Senior REHS, Site Mitigation Unit <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> Public Health Services <br /> San Joaquin County 6;CEIVED <br /> 445 N San Joaquin Street APR 0 3 ins <br />' Stockton, CA 95201-0388 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> RE: U-HAUL CENTER # 709-50 <br /> 2701 N. WILSON WAY, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA <br /> SOTA'S PROJECT NO. 94HWO21 <br />' Dear Mr Infurna <br />' SOTA Environmental Technology, Inc (SOTA) is pleased to submit the following <br /> (revised) Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report for your review This report <br /> documents the groundwater sampling program that was conducted on February <br /> 21 and 22, 1995 at the subject site The site location map is presented in <br /> Figure 1 Figure 2, shows the location of well, the groundwater elevations, the <br /> groundwater contours and flow direction for February 21, 1995 Groundwater <br /> concentrations of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons-gasoline standard (TPH-g) are <br />' provided in Figure 3 <br /> SOTA's geologist measured the depth to groundwater at all six monitoring wells, <br />' MW-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, and -6, on February 21, 1995 The depth to the water <br /> level and the corresponding surface elevations, with respect to mean sea level, <br /> are presented in Table 1 SOTA's geologist informed San Joaquin County <br />' Environmental Health Division of the proposed sampling event, in advance, on <br /> February 15, 1995 <br /> The sampling program was conducted as described below A minimum of 4 well <br />' volumes, which was calculated to be approximately 16 gallons, was purged from <br /> each of the six wells During purging operations the temperature, pH, and <br /> conductivity were measured with the water flowing through a continuous flow <br />' chamber The pumping was carried on until the temperature, pH, and <br /> conductivity values stabilized within at least 5% of previous readings MW-1, <br /> MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-5, and MW-6 were purged of approximately 25 <br /> gallons of water per well using a 2-inch submersible pump Copies of the field <br />' observation which includes temperature, pH, and conductivity values are <br /> enclosed in Appendix-A Proper decontamination procedures which included <br /> flushing the pump and hose with a solution of detergent and water, followed by <br />' clean tap water, with a final rinse using deionized water were employed The <br /> purged water is stored in 55-gallon DOT approved drums which have been <br /> labeled and stored on-site for subsequent treatment/disposal Adequate time <br /> was allowed for recovery after purging All monitoring wells were allowed to <br /> recover to 95 percent or more of their static water level condition At the time of <br />' 16980 Via Tazon Suite 130 430 Foothill Blvd Suite B <br /> San Diego CA 92127 1633 La Canada CA 91 o11 <br /> 619 485 8100 FAX 619 485 0812 818 952 8124 818 790 2080 <br />