Laserfiche WebLink
So►L� k <br /> Environmental Technology Inc <br /> product nor sheen was noticed in any of the monitoring wells Dedicated,/ <br /> bailers were used for sampling activities at each of the wells, in order to <br /> eliminate possible cross examination <br /> The six water samples collected were stored in an ice chest at 4 degrees Celsius <br /> Appropriate chain of custody was prepared prior to transporting to a State <br />' certified laboratory Del Mar Analytical, Irvine, CA performed the laboratory <br /> analyses All the water samples were analyzed for Total Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline (Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons) and Benzene, <br /> Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes (BTEX) following EPA Methods 8015/8020 <br />' The test data are presented in Table 2 <br /> All laboratory analytical results including QA/QC are enclosed with this letter <br /> report Table 2 also includes the historical data for wells MW-1 through MW-6 <br /> The groundwater level observations (Table 1) indicated a consistent increase of <br /> approximately 3 4 to 3 5 feet during the reporting period (9/28/94 and <br /> 12/l/94) It should be noted be that fluctuation in groundwater level is a <br /> common occurrence in the Stockton area as reported by Applied Consultants <br /> data April 9, 1994 Figure 2 presents the groundwater contour map It appears <br /> that theeneral groundwater now direction is towards the west <br /> During the period 9/94 and 12/94, TPH (gasoline) concentrations in MW-1, <br /> MW-2, MW-4, MW-5 and MW-6 haveme uced from 21,000, 2,300, 12,000, 600 <br /> and 3,400 to 5,300, 1, 100, 2,200, 420, and 1,200 respectively TPH <br /> concentrations in MW-3 has increased from 88 to 500 A TPH concentration <br /> contour map is presented in Figure 3 <br /> Similar trends of decrease in Benzene concentration at the wells MW-1, MW-2, <br /> MW-4, MW-5, and MW-6 were reported except at MW-3 where the benzene <br /> concentration has increased from 8 9 to 97 µg/l <br /> Based on these and past observations, SO_TA pro oses further delineation of the <br /> ro water contamination lume as re uired b San Joa uin County SOTA <br /> as submitted a workplan detailing the proposed additional site assessment on <br /> or before November 29, 1994, and awaiting county review comments and �- <br /> approval <br /> Should there be any questions regarding this transmittal please contact me or .� <br /> Larry Busch at (619) 485-8100 s <br /> Sincerely, <br /> SO A Environmental Technology, Inc , ��� �`° '��'*' ,� ���"., <br /> Dakshana Murthy, Ph D , P E F {' <br />' Project Manager r_ M31 <br /> 4- <br /> cc Steve Gilbert, U-Haul International, Phoenix, AZ �' <br />