Laserfiche WebLink
' 20 March 2006 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0130 <br />' Page 3 of 13 <br /> • 07 November 2005 - Monthly monitoring event performed on P&T and SVE remediation <br /> Isystem <br /> • 06 December 2005 - Quarterly ground water monitoring event performed at wells MW-1 <br />' through MW-3,MW-5 through MW-8,VW-1C,VW-2A and VW-3A, monthly monitoring <br /> event performed on SVE remediation system <br />' • 07 December 2005 - Monthly monitoring event performed on P&T remediation system <br />' 2.0. GROUND WATER MONITORING PROCEDURES <br /> A quarterly groundwater monitoring event was performed at the site on 06 December 2005 Ground <br />' water monitoring procedures for the site were outlined in the Work Plan Addendum - June 2001, <br /> dated 11 June 2001 and approved by the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br />' (SJCEHD) by letter dated 07 July 2001 <br />' • 2 1 WELL MONITORING AND PURGING <br /> On 06 December 2005, depth to ground water was measured in each well from the top of the well <br /> casing to the nearest 0 01-foot utilizing a Solinst water level meter Ground water could not be <br /> recovered from wells MW-6A and MW-7A and the monitoring location was subsequently reported <br /> as `dry', a tubing obstruction was encountered from well MW-7E and ground water samples could <br />' not be collected, well MW-4 was inaccessible due to a parked car and could not be sampled The <br /> ground water elevation at wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-5 through MW-8 were calculated <br /> by subtracting the measured depth to ground water from the surveyed casing elevation As-built <br />' monitoring well construction details are summarized in Table 1 Ground water elevations were <br /> plotted and contoured on scaled site maps depicting First Zone and Second Zone ground water <br /> elevations (Figures 3 and 4, respectively) <br /> After water levels were measured, approximately 6 to 17 gallons of ground water (a minimum of <br /> three casing-water volumes per well) were purged from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-5 and <br /> tMW-8 by lowering and raising a dedicated 3/8-inch diameter, length-discrete polyethylene hose <br /> equipped with a ball-valve water tip through the specific water-charged screened section <br /> Approximately 1/3 to 3`/4 gallons of ground water (a minimum of three casing-water volumes per <br /> well) were purged from wells MW-6 and MW-7 by lowering and raising a disposable 3/8-inch <br /> diameter,length-discrete polyethylene hose equipped with a ball-valve water tip through the specific <br /> I water-charged screened section A Watera Hydro-Lift 11 pump equipped with a mechanical arm was <br /> utilized to surge the polyethylene hose Temperature, pH and conductivity were measured for <br /> stabilization at regular purge-volume intervals from each well using the Oakton water analyzer Field <br /> Advanced GcoEnvironmentai,Inc <br />