Laserfiche WebLink
iS <br /> 4 i <br /> 25 July 1995 <br /> AGE-NC-95-0130 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> 4 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-g was detected in samples from MW-2 and MW-3 at concentrations of 420 µg/1 (parts per <br /> billion ppb) and 2,800 ppb, respectively Benzene was detected in samples from each well at <br /> concentrations up to 930 ppb(MW-3) Toluene, ethyl benzene and xylenes were detected in samples <br /> from MW-2 and MW-3 at concentrations ranging from 18 ppb (toluene, MW-2) to 230 ppb (ethyl <br /> benzene, MW-3) No TPH-g was detected an the water sample from MW-1 The analytical results <br /> of all the ground water samples are summarized in Table 2 The laboratory reports and chain-of- <br /> custody are included in Appendix A <br /> 5.0. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Ground water gradient calculations indicate that MW-2 has remained the down-gradient well since <br /> January 1995 However, the highest concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in <br /> MW-3 for the second consecutive quarter <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted ground water has been detected on the property directly to the east <br /> of the site, across Wilson Way (Roek property) It appears that ground water flow direction in the <br /> vicinity of the site rotates or shifts seasonally from northeast to southeast This shift in ground <br /> water flow directions may have caused hte hydrocarbon plumes from both sites to coalesce <br /> We recommend performing historical research concerning petroleum products used at the Top Falling <br /> property and the Roek property If the research indicates a distinction between petroleum usage at <br /> the two sites, then a"fuel fingerprinting" of ground water samples collected from the Top Filling site <br /> can then be performed to identify specific petroleum products <br /> Further assessment of ground water at the site will be required A work plan has been approved by <br /> PHS-EHD for the installation of two addtional wells One well as proposed northwest of MW-1 and <br /> a second well as proposed for the southwest portion of the property At least one vapor extraction <br /> well and two vapor extra extraction observation wells should also be installed for performance of a <br /> feasnbinty study <br /> 6.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing an this or similar localities The findings were based upon <br /> analytical results provided by an independent laboratory Evaluations of the geologic/hydrogeologic <br /> conditions at the site for the purpose of this investigation are made from a limited number of data <br />