Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kelly Williamson <br /> October 28, 1985 <br /> Page Two <br /> In the process of installing the bore holes, soil samples were taken with a <br /> split spoon sampler every five feet from the surface to the groundwater to <br /> classify soil types and screen for contamination. Each sample was screened, <br /> using a 5A Toluene drager tube and pump. All samples that indicated a <br /> detectable reading on the drager tube were sent to Twining Laboratories for <br /> analysis. <br /> As of this date, the results of these analysis ,have not been recieved, but <br /> they will be forwarded to you as soon as they arrive. <br /> I am attaching a chart on all the groundwater monitoring data that has been <br /> performed between 6-22-85 and .10-27-85, along with the monitor well elevations, <br /> and the laboratory results of the water samples taken on 8--26-85 from MW#6 <br /> and MW#7- Due to the fact that raw product has been found on the surface of <br /> the groundwater in MW#5 in significant amounts and the analysis of the water <br /> samples taken from MW#6 and MW#7 show relatively high concentrations of -dis- <br /> solved hydrocarbons, it would be my recommendation that a hydrocarbon recovery <br /> system, utilizing a groundwater depression pump and a hydrocarbon recovery <br /> pump be installed as soon as possible to begin remediation and restoration of <br /> the contaminated area. <br /> 1 am attaching drawings of a proposed hydrocarbon recovery system and a re- <br /> covery well . I recommend a 24" recovery well approximately 70 feet in depth, <br /> to provide a high recharge capability that will allow a sufficient depression` <br /> of the groundwater, thereby creating a cone of influence large enough to be <br /> effective in causing the effected groundwater and phased product to return to <br /> the recovery well for treatment or recovery. <br /> In surveying this location for the possi le placement of a recovery well and :. <br /> system, it was noted that one of the underground storage tanks, which tested <br /> tight, is stili in place. Since this location -is no longer in operation , I <br /> would propose that this underground tarok be placed into service as the re- <br /> covered product tank for the recovery system. The use of this tank would <br /> speed installation and reduce the overall cost of the recovery system. <br /> Attached, you will find a site drawing with the proposed recovery well and <br /> system locations indicated. <br /> By placing the recovery system under the canopy in the area of the north pump <br /> island, it will provide more security anld the existing electrical conduits <br /> can be utilized, reducing the installation cost even further. <br /> A study will have to be made on the dispi sit,i,on of the recovery system effluent, <br /> if a recovery system is decided upon. Discharge of the recovery system efflu- <br /> ent might possibly be handled in one of the following ways: <br /> (1) Into the sanitary sewer, when that project is complete, <br /> and i-f allowed by the Waste Water department of the City <br /> of Stockton <br /> (2) Into the storm sewer system, if allowed, or <br /> (3) Reinjection beds on the perimeter of the property. <br />