My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
4325
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545834
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2020 3:00:59 PM
Creation date
7/15/2020 1:32:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545834
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005104
FACILITY_NAME
ECONO GAS
STREET_NUMBER
4325
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15733708
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4325 E WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
;Qr <br /> ,r^fir' -r`•°:T ��; ';ice- � - . <br /> Mr. Mike Hansen -2- 4 April 1988 <br /> been presented to explain the presence of the TPH plume and <br /> the absence of the benzene plume. Benzene usually migrates , <br /> faster in ground water than most other components of <br /> gasoline so having a TPH plume larger than benzene plume is <br /> unusual and needs to be explained. Please provide <br /> chromatograms (including interpretations) from the most <br /> recent analysis of those wells with non-detectable benzene <br /> and detectable TPH. <br /> We have no- objections to water samples being collected from <br /> the fringe wells and analyzed for TPH by EPA method 8270; <br /> however, the results may still be ambiguous. <br /> - Y-our a _ . - <br /> qua.fer 't°este have shown"that�aii-fer response toy <br /> pumping is- rapid; however, the tests also showed that the <br /> aquifers can not be pumped atthe rates suggested. Proper <br /> data analysis and interpretation needs to be done to <br /> determine how many recovery wells will be sufficient to <br /> remediate each site' in a reasonable period of time. Results <br /> to date suggest to us that one recovery well is insufficient- <br /> to control the plumes of contamination and remediate the <br /> site in a timely manner. Also, statements in each report <br /> that ground water flow rates are low, at a maximum of 20 <br /> inches per day, suggest the contrary to us; as 20 inches per <br /> day is over 600 feet per year! <br /> Please submit the missing data, and the requested chromatograms, <br /> as an addendum to each PAR by 8 April 1988. The other points can' <br /> be addressed, with adequate solutions, in the Final Remedial Plan,, <br /> for each site which is due 4 June <br /> If you have any questions, please call me at (916) 361-5731. '. <br /> GARY S. JOHNSON N� <br /> Engineering Geologist <br /> GSJ:gj <br /> cc: v4s. Laurie Cotulla, San Joaquin Local Health DistrictId, <br /> Stockton <br /> Mr. Dave Ellis, Groundwater Bire-mediationServices, <br /> Wilmington, Delaware <br /> Mr. Kent Parrish, Exceltech, Fremont <br /> �1 <br /> J � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.