Laserfiche WebLink
manatt <br /> manatt I phelps I phillips <br /> Elianna Florido <br /> January 4, 2019 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 203—Transport of Hazardous Waste to an Unauthorized Point <br /> The inspection report alleges that Rite Aid's processing of warfarin through reverse <br /> distribution to MedTurn is improper on the basis that MedTurn is not authorized by DTSC to <br /> receive hazardous waste. <br /> As a preliminary matter, and as detailed in a number of recent return to compliance <br /> responses, Rite Aid objects to this alleged violation regarding the reverse distribution of <br /> pharmaceuticals on the basis that it violates the terms of the settlement entered into between Rite <br /> Aid and various counties in California, including San Joaquin County (settlement agreement is <br /> attached as Exhibit 2). Specifically, Section 4.2.b of the settlement states that: <br /> During the term of this Final Judgment, the People shall only pursue a violation <br /> of this Final Judgment or applicable law regarding the reverse distribution of <br /> pharmaceuticals if Defendant is unable to demonstrate reasonable diligence in <br /> performing work on the federal regulatory reform described in subparagraph <br /> 4.2.a above. For the purposes of this paragraph, "pharmaceuticals"shall have <br /> the same meaning as "drug"as defined by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic <br /> Act, 21 USC§321(g). <br /> As a signatory to the settlement agreement, San Joaquin County is bound by its terms. <br /> See e.g. Lerner v. L.A. City Bd. of Ed., 59 Cal. 2d 382, 398 (1963) (finding that "agents of the <br /> same government are in privity with each other, since they represent not their own rights but the <br /> right of the government."); see also People v. Sims, 32 Cal. 3d 468, 486-88 (1982) (same). Rite <br /> Aid has actively participated in both state and federal regulatory reform regarding the reverse <br /> distribution of pharmaceuticals and therefore this demand for information regarding Rite Aid's <br /> handling of expired warfarin or Coumadin through reverse distribution is improper and in <br /> violation of the terms of Rite Aid's settlement agreement. <br /> However, without waiving the foregoing objection, Rite Aid responds as follows: this <br /> violation is without merit because the items identified in the inspection report (warfarin sent to <br /> MedTurn for return processing) is not a waste, and therefore a permit from DTSC authorizing <br /> MedTurn to receive hazardous waste from Rite Aid is not required. As described in previous <br /> correspondence from Rite Aid, Rite Aid's pharmacy return procedures are entirely consistent <br /> with EPA's policy on pharmacy reverse distribution (see RO 11606 (May 16, 1991)), and also <br /> has the added benefit of both (1) sustainably and appropriately consolidating and managing <br /> pharmacy items for return to manufacturer or other final disposition, and (2) avoiding diversion <br /> of pharmaceuticals. <br />