Laserfiche WebLink
The radius of influence generated during the aquifer pump test performed on groundwater extraction well <br />EX -1 can be calculated from the field data collected during the pump test Based on the quality of the <br />collected data, and comparison with typical transmissivities, the design transmissivity specific to the site <br />was established as the mean transmissivity of SVE-2, SVE-3, and MW -12 of 0 1354 ft2/min Different <br />radii of influence specific to down gradient capture zones and cross -gradient capture zones can be <br />determined based of the pumping well volume rate (Q), transmissivity (T), and groundwater gradient (i) <br />The down gradient capture zone radius of influence (Ddown), defined as <br />Dd.,, =Q/(2*Pi*T*1), is calculated to be 314 feet, <br />Based on observed aquifer test characteristics of Q=2 0 gallon per minute (gpm), T=0 1354 ft2/mm, and a <br />mean gradient of 1=0 001 feet per foot (ft/ft) The cross -gradient capture zone radius of influence (Dross), <br />defined as <br />Dc,,,S Q/(T*i), is calculated to be 1,970 feet, <br />Based on Q=2 0 gpm, T=0 1354 ft2/inin, and 1=0 001 ft/ft <br />lr�-ad,&t on to r'os`;i}11vCC1rt1.,1' ?,-v1"; ai--,IV-(I - i`jJI' or'lit)0.1 i- `ro'.-rtti,-1f-rT"Ida,t','yii11 F 1, <br />the established capture zones, groundwater extraction could effectively expose additional hydrocarbon - <br />impacted soil that is occluded by higher groundwater levels from vapor extraction remedial treatment <br />Based on the data presented in the previous table, exponential and natural logarithmic least square fit <br />equations of y=9 0298e-) 1194i and y=-2 4551ln(x)+8 0697, respectively, describe the observed draw down <br />profiles with x as the draw down in feet and y being the radial distance from groundwater extraction well <br />EX -1 in feet <br />The values of the calculated hydraulic conductivity and groundwater yield suggest that the use of <br />conventional groundwater gravity wells, or dual phase vapor and groundwater extraction, may be an <br />acceptable means of extracting groundwater to control plume migration or to expose hydrocarbon - <br />impacted soil <br />9 0 REMEDIAL FEASIBILITY TESTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Based on field observations, review of historic documents, and laboratory analytical results collected <br />during the remedial feasibility studies conducted at the site, ATC believes that the hydrocarbon impacted <br />soil and groundwater can be remediated in-situ at the site The vapor extraction feasibility study indicates <br />vapor extraction technology could be successful in remediating hydrocarbon -impacted soil onsite The <br />aquifer test indicated that combining groundwater extraction with vapor extraction could extend the <br />capabilities of a vapor extraction system Additionally, combining air sparge technology with the dual <br />phase extraction technology may effectively remediate the dissolved phase hydrocarbon plume <br />EZ 100966 CAP <br />S \EZ Sme\FZ 1009661Reports1100966CAP <br />17 <br />ATC Associates Inc <br />ATC Prosect No 43 25827 0026 <br />