Laserfiche WebLink
o <br /> Mir <br /> � ° ~ PUBLIC Y- JEALTH S <br /> ` <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br /> Ernest M. Fujimoto, M. D., M.P.H., Acting HellalthOfficer <br /> 304 E. Weber Ave,, Third Floor o R 0' Box 388 Stockton, CA 95201-0388 <br /> / �D�/460-���D / ' <br /> � , <br /> ED <br /> '� ~��� <br /> ����. \� <br /> � <br /> � JONATHAN N1ARLOVVE NM\/� �1��c <br /> ' N1ARLOVVE PROPERTIES <br /> , —� ---- NOV2~ ° /u�`� <br /> PO BOX 158211 <br /> SAN RAFAELCA 34915'0211 <br /> � Re: Marlowe !| ' Site Code: 1828 <br /> | / ' <br /> ' 4G48Waterloo Road <br /> | <br /> Stockton CA 85215 � <br /> ` <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Helalth Di vision (PHS/EHD) has <br /> � <br /> � <br /> October 23, 1995 and your correspondence dated October 24, 1995 with the attached Advanced <br /> ' <br /> � GeoEnvnonnnonto 'a correspondence doted October 20' 19951. PHS/EHD has prepared the following <br /> . <br /> comments for your consideration.Thank you for bringing it to PHS/EHD's attention that the wrong ztp;�code was used on <br /> � <br /> | ' <br /> correspondence directed to your attention. It is certainly PHS1/EHD's:1 intention to provide <br /> correspondence for your attention in a timely manner. <br /> The report included analytical results from purge water sampling but'failed to indicate the use of <br /> these <br /> � <br /> ' . PHS/EHD concurs that disposal of purge waterland drums is necessary. <br /> / <br /> submit_- - description _ - pr-p---- ---_- _ disposal. <br /> , <br /> ` The quarterly_ report included analytical result_ from ground- <br /> � <br /> April 26, 1885 and 1S85 hu <br /> > � ' '' continued — evidence gro '' <br /> ' PHS/EHO agrees that the rise in groundwater may be contributing toe denrwenm in hydrocarbon <br /> concentrationsin MW2MW3d MW4PHS/EHD has evaluated historical information available <br /> from prior groundwater data and from well construction details and s!'uggests that the affects of` <br /> dilution be considered oorqnm omnomomy that the oec,oaaa in C"onceriltrations is due to natural <br /> i <br /> quarters indicate that groundwater is approximately 7 to 10 feet above the screened intervals of the <br /> ` vva||s' K8VV2 ��VY� andK�VV4 ' <br /> ' ' ' | l <br /> Table 3 indicated that 1detecti'ed in the sample collected from MW4 <br /> | April 26, '--- when in fact the laboratory report indicated'that none was detected. Table 3also . <br /> indicated that no 1,1. -Trichloroethane_ _- .._-----,_. <br /> w.,as detected in the sample <br /> i <br /> 1,1,1-Trichloroethane and 2= ppb 'nwxxoeuyle//o was oeu,8ted. Please make these non0000no <br /> | forth* historical record and submit to PHS/EHD in addendum the corrected tmb|a' <br /> � <br /> � <br /> Figures 2 3d 4indicated thmt MW1 was dry when in fact it contains sufficient groundwater to <br /> purge and sample. Please survey this well in relation to the as moon as possible and <br /> � <br /> prepare groundwater elevation maps which are representative conditions. The fluxuotionain <br /> � <br /> groundwater gradient and direction may be attributed to this 6 ernight. <br /> i| ^ <br /> d <br /> � ^ <br /> / <br /> | <br /> � aDivision oaSan Joaquin County Health Cvresemic'e <br />