Laserfiche WebLink
� l <br /> II� <br /> j <br /> 26 April 2011 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0104 <br /> Page 8 of 12 { <br /> On 14 July 2000, one confirmational soil probe boring (P-1) was advanced at the site to <br /> assess the effectiveness of SVE remediation effort at the site. TPH-d was detected in four <br /> of the soil samples collected from probe boring P-1 at concentrations as high as 410 mg/kg <br /> (P1-25). TPH-d was not detected in soil samples collected from depths of 35 and 40 feet <br /> bsg however, the 45-foot soil sample contained TPH-d 'at a concentration of 1.8 mg/kg. <br /> TPH-g and BTEX compounds were not detected in any of the `soil samples analyzed. The <br /> only soil samples collected from the site that have been analyzed for 1,2-DCA were <br /> collected from probe boring P-1 in July 2000.Analysis of the post remediation soil samples <br /> indicated that there is no 1 ,2-DCA impacted soil beneath the site (Table 2). <br /> 5.0. ASSESSMENT OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL AND GROUNDWATER <br /> SOIL IMPACT <br /> I Between 1988 and 2000, two soil borings (B-1 and P-1), fourteen ground water monitoring E <br />€ wells (MW-1 through MW-14) and one soil vapor extraction well (VW-1)were installed at <br /> the site to investigate the extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil and ground water in the <br /> vicinity of the former UST and down-gradient of the former UST area. <br /> a <br /> The greatest concentrations of hydrocarbon-impacted soil has:been encountered at vapor <br /> well VW-1. Figures 4 through 6 depict general lithology'and selected soil sample results <br /> beneath the site in cross sectional view. The UST appears to have been the release point, <br /> once discharged into the subsurface the contamination �igrated vertically to 50 or 55 feet <br /> bsg, intercepted a high water table level and dissolved into the groundwater.The dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons and fuel additive 1,2-DCA migrated east-northeast as depicted in Figure 6. <br /> A volume-mass calculation using the data collected during investigation of the former UST <br /> area, yields approximately 1,287 pounds or 206 gallons of gasoline in the impacted soil at <br /> the site prior to SVE remediation. The lateral extent of impacted soil, prior to SVE <br /> remediation is depicted in Figure 2. An average concentration of 8,050 mg/kg (Tank <br /> Bottom @1T and VW1-25) was used to calculate the total vol 1 me of initial hydrocarbons <br /> from 15 to 30 feet bsg, while 3.4 mg/kg (MW 1-45)was used to calculate the total volume <br /> from 15 to 45 feet bsg. Current residual mass has not been calculated, based on the lack <br /> of petroleum detections for gasoline. Petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil volume <br /> calculations (pre-remediation) are included in Appendix D. k <br /> �r <br /> AGE estimated that operation of the SVE system removed approximately 158.92 gallons <br /> of gasoline,or approximately 77 percent of petroleum hydrocarbons formerly impacting soil <br /> at the site. <br /> iP <br /> ii Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br /> 'r <br /> 4 k <br />