Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> 07 May 1999 <br /> • AGE-NC Protect No 95-0104 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> collected in Tedlar bags using an organic vapor analyzer as an air pump <br /> Following sample collection, the samples were placed in a covered container and transported under <br /> cham-of custody to McCampbell Analytical Inc (MAI) in Pacheco, California Each sample was <br /> analyzed within 72 hours for TPH-g and BTE&X in accordance with EPA Methods 8015m and <br /> 8020, respectively <br /> 4.0. FINDINGS <br />' From ground water monitoring data,AGE was able to determine the ground water flow direction and <br /> gradient Laboratory analysis detected fuel hydrocarbons in one ground water sample (MW-5), <br /> Itoluene and xylenes were detected in one ground water sample (MW-4) <br /> From field data collected dunng operation of the SVE/IAS pilot test and from laboratory analysis <br /> I of four soil gas samples,AGE was able to estimate the volume of vapor gasoline extracted from well <br /> VW-1 <br /> lie <br /> 4 1 RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> During the April 1999 morutonng event, depths to ground water in wells MW-1 through MW-6 and <br /> VW-1 were measured between 52 57 and 53 35 feet below the tops of well casings, between the <br /> I January and April 1999 ground water monitoring events, ground water elevation at the site increased <br /> an average 5 29 feet The ground water elevation data for MW-1 through MW-6 and VW-1 during <br /> the April 1999 ground water monitoring event is depicted in Figure 3 and shown on Table 1 <br /> Ground water flow direction in the area of MW-1 through MW-6 was generally toward the northeast <br /> at a gradient of 0 003 ft/ft, or approximately 15 feet per mile (Figure 3) Ground water was <br /> Iapproximately 27 feet above the screen intervals at MW-2, MW-3 and MW4 and between 10 and <br /> 14 feet above the screen intervals at MW-5 and MW-6 Therefore these wells are "drowned", and <br /> yield samples more representative of deeper ground water than of shallow ground water, which is <br /> commonly the more intensely impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons Monitoring well MW-1 and <br /> vapor extraction well VW-1 are screened across the top of the saturated zone <br /> 4 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> A total of six ground water samples were submitted to a DHS-certified laboratory in April 1999 <br /> • TPH-g was detected in a water sample collected from well MW-5 at a concentration of 120 <br /> micrograms per liter(µg/1), <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmenial,Inc. <br />