Laserfiche WebLink
28 April 1995 <br /> AGE-NC-95-0103 <br /> Page 11 of 11 <br /> volume increases and the microbes encounter decreasing hydrocarbon concentrations toward the <br /> margins of the contaminant plume Based on the volume and concentration of the impacted soil, <br /> the usage of one inoculation well and the relatively high permeability of soil, we estimate that <br /> remediation may take between 12 and 30 months If only one inoculation event is performed, <br /> approximately 100 gallons of inoculum will be utilized <br /> 5 3 6 FEASIBILITY <br /> No feasibility studies for in-situ bioremediation halve been performed at the site <br /> I5 _37 ESTIMATED COSTS OF Ill'-.SI J U BIOREMEDIATION <br /> The cost for 3n-situ bioremediation will \an, depending upon the volume of inoculant required <br /> and the number of remediation wells to be inoculated Generally, the cost for in-situ <br /> bioremediation will range from $20,000 to 560,000 Weekly and monthly monitoring will <br /> generally cost between $1,500 and $5,000 per month, soil borings to monitor bioremediation <br /> progress typically cost $3,000 to $6,000 per quarter If a low pressure air system is required at <br /> the site to provide o\ygen to the bacteria, installation of a typical blower system will cost between <br /> $2,000 and $4,000 Maintenance casts for the blower s}stem are minimal Z <br />' 6.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based upon the relative costs and feasibilit\ of a\ailable remediation methods, we recommend the <br /> Iinstallation of a soil vapor extraction sN steni at the site Based upon data collected during the <br /> vapor e\tiaction pilot test, N\e recommend installation of a thermal oxidation unit Extraction <br /> from RW-1 should successfully remove hS drocarbons from the vadose zone We do not belle-,e <br /> that addtional e\traction wells will be required <br /> 7.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> I Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised <br /> by environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities The findings were mainly <br /> based on analytical j esults provided by an independent laboratory Evaluations of the geologic <br /> conditions at the site for the purpose of this investigation are made from a limited number of <br /> available data points (i e monitoring and vapor wells) and subsurface conditions may vary away <br /> from these data points No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional <br /> recommendations contained in this report <br /> I <br />