Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> ito groundwater in each monitoring well was measured to the nearest 0 01 foot with a Solinst <br /> water level meter As in previous momtonng events, no groundwater was present in MW-1 <br /> After measurement of the depths to water, a 4-inch Grundfos submersible pump was used <br /> to surge and purge the wells Between 52 and 76 gallons of water (minimum of 3 well <br /> volumes) were removed from each well to stabilize temperature, pH and conductivity before <br /> i collection of a water sample Stabilization data were collected using Onon pH, conductivity <br /> and temperature meters The purge water was placed in 55-gallon drums and stored on-site <br /> Stabilization data are included in Appendix A <br /> iA water sample was collected from each well using a new disposable plastic bailer Each <br /> sample was collected in five 40-m1 EPA vials, placed in a chilled container and transported <br /> ito a state-certified laboratory <br /> 3.3 Laboratory Analysis <br /> i water samples were transported to Alpha Analytical Laboratories (AAL) in <br /> The soil and p p P yt <br /> Ukiah and for analysis Six soil samples were analyzed for TPH as gasoline and volatile <br /> iaromatic compounds (BTE&X) in accordance with EPA methods 8015 and 8020, <br /> respectively Three of the samples were also analyzed for halogenated organic compounds <br /> (HVOC's) in accordance with EPA method 8010 <br /> i <br /> The water samples were analyzed for TPH as gasoline. BTE&X and HVOC's in accordance <br /> with EPA methods 8015, 602 and 601, respectively <br /> i4.0 FINDINGS <br /> 4.1 Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil <br /> iTPH as gasoline, benzene and ethylbenzene were detected in sample VW1-25 at 14,000µglg <br /> (ppm), 14 ppm and 220 ppm, respectively Toluene was detected in VWI-25 and VW1-45 <br /> i at concentrations of 600 ppm and 0 0064 ppm, respectively, xylenes were detected in VW1- <br /> 25, VW1-35 and VW-45 at concentrations of 1,200 ppm, 0 018 ppm and 0 0058 ppm, <br /> respectively No HVOC's were detected in the soil samples The analytical results of the soil <br /> isamples are summanzed in Table 1 The laboratory report and chain of custody are included <br /> in Appendix C <br /> i4.2 Groundwater Gradient and Direction <br /> At the time of monitoring, groundwater depth at the site was approximately 79 feet The <br /> idepth to groundwater has risen approximately 3 feet since the January monitonng This is <br /> consistent with a regional rise in groundwater depth since January Well casing elevations <br /> iand groundwater depth data are summarized in Table 2 <br /> C 1nyal A.61 S.ry 1., <br /> Af-dl P-P-n—QM 9411 33 <br /> I <br />