Laserfiche WebLink
' 18 February 1997 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0104 <br />' Page 5 of 22 <br />' at MW-3 and MW-4 may be attributed to screen intervals submerged beneath water <br /> A vacuum was not measured in well MW-2 during the pilot test, located approximately 30 feet from <br />' VW-1 However, a strong vacuum was measured at MW-1 Therefore, based upon the vacuums <br /> measured from VW-1 and MW-1, it is likely that the effective radius of influence for soils at the site <br /> is approximately twenty feet <br /> 3 5 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF VAPOR SAMPLES <br />' Hydrocarbon concentrations in the effluent stream from VW-1 were monitored at regular intervals <br /> utilizing a PID The PID field measurements ranged from 275 ppm to 423 ppm Laboratory analysis <br />' of the four vapor samples collected detected TPH-g concentrations ranging from 11,000 micrograms <br /> per liter (ug/1) to 23,000 pg/1 (see Table 3) Converting these values to parts per million volume <br /> (ppmv), concentrations ranged from 3,080 ppmv to 6,440 ppmv The laboratory report and chain-of- <br /> custody are included in Appendix B Equations for conversion of ugll to ppmv are included in <br /> Appendix C <br /> 40 ASSESSMENT OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL,AND GROUNDWATER <br /> IBetween 1988 and 1996, one soil boring (B-1), six ground water monitoring wells (MW-1 through <br /> MW-6) and one soil vapor extraction well (VW-1) were installed at the cite to investigate the extent <br /> I of hydrocarbon-impacted soil and ground water in the vicinity of the former UST The greatest <br /> concentrations of hydrocarbon-impacted soil and ground water has been encountered at SVT-well <br /> VW-1 A general decline of concentrations of dissolved petroleum hydrocai bons has been reported <br /> in wells MW-1 and MW-2 However, since April 1994, ground water surface has been above the <br /> slotted screen interval in MW-2 and, therefore, data from MW-2 may not accurately represent <br /> surficial ground water composition Analytical results of soil and ground water samples are <br /> summarized in Table Nos 1 and 2 <br /> Figures 4 and 5 depict general hthology and selected soil sample results beneath the site in cross <br /> sectional view When the data collected at the site is plotted in both plan view and cross sectional <br /> view, the apparent volume of petroleum impacted soil beneath the site is approximately 220 cubic <br /> yards (Appendix D) <br /> A mass-volume calculation usingthe data collected during investigation of the former <br /> g g UST area, <br /> yields approximately 308 gallons of gasoline in the remaining impacted soil at the site (Appendix Dl <br /> Assuming that VW-1 is within the source area, an effective radius of fifteen-feet was used to estimate <br /> the volume of impacted soil An average concentration of 14,000 ppm was used to calculate the total <br /> volume of remaining hydrocarbons from 15 to 30 feet bsg, while 1 1 ppm was used to calculate the <br />