My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008413
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
4648
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545864
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2020 10:00:58 AM
Creation date
7/21/2020 9:46:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008413
RECORD_ID
PR0545864
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004530
FACILITY_NAME
MARLOWE PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
4648
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4648 WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> I18 February 1997 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0104 <br /> Page 18 of 22 <br /> CVRWQCB for the injection of nutrients into ground water <br /> Typically, the microbes utilized in bioremediation are aerobic and usually require additional oxygen <br /> to supplement dissolved oxygen concentrations in ground water Generally, several air sparging or <br /> in-well aeration sources are sufficient to provide the necessary oxygen However, in some cases the <br /> addition of hydrogen peroxide is necessary <br /> 7 3 3 MONITORING ACTIVITIES <br /> After inoculation, the inoculation wells andround water monitoring wells should be monitored for <br /> g g <br /> several months by periodic field measurements of organic vapors, carbon dioxide and oxygen Ground <br /> water samples should be collected and analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons, bacterial populations <br /> and nutrient availability If monitoring indicates areas of slow remediation, additional inoculations <br /> may be required <br /> 7 3 4 FEASIBILITY STUDIES <br /> Results of the bioremediation pilot tests at other sites indicate that lighter petroleum hydrocarbons, <br /> such as gasoline compounds are more readily biodegraded than longer-chain (heavier) hydrocarbons, <br /> such as diesel fuel compounds Feasibility studies have not been performed at the subject site <br /> 7 3 5 DURATION <br /> Cleanup durations for in-situ bioremediation will vary, depending upon specific site characteristics <br /> However, because of the relatively low concentrations of dissolved hydrocarbons at the site, a <br /> treatment period of 18 months should be achievable <br /> 7 3 6 COST <br /> I Bioremediation ofround water can be a very cost-effective method of treatment With little on-site <br /> g <br /> equipment required beyond the initial inoculation, the cost for in-situ bioremediation at the site would <br /> be between $25,000 and $65,000 However, monitoring will vary depending upon regulatory <br /> requirements, which could significantly increase the total cost of the project <br /> Typical costs for monthly monitoring of an in-situ bioremediation system, in addition to standard <br /> • quarterly sampling, would be approximately $1,500 00 per month Based on an I8-month treatment <br /> period, the total cost for ria-situ bioremediation at the site would be between $50,000 and $90,000 00 <br /> G7,0C)o -�',oon.- <br /> -�- Yy l� M,9AkAP1%kt- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.