My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008417
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
4648
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545864
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2020 9:59:59 AM
Creation date
7/21/2020 9:49:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008417
RECORD_ID
PR0545864
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004530
FACILITY_NAME
MARLOWE PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
4648
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4648 WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 February 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0104 <br />' Page 2 of 4 <br />' became dry due to a declining water table <br /> Between December 1992 and September 1993, three additional monitoring wells (MW-2, MW-3 and <br />' MWA)were installed at the site No petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected <br /> during installation of the additional wells However, bromomethane was detected in one soil sample <br /> collected from MW-4 Installation and sampling procedures, and the results of laboratory analysis <br /> were included in the Quarterly Report- October 1993 prepared by Geological Audit Services, Inc <br /> I (GAS) <br />' On 04 April 1995, one vapor extraction well (VW-1)was installed at the site near the center position <br /> of the former UST Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected during <br /> installation at concentrations as high as 14,000 parts per million (ppm) Subsequently, AGE <br /> performed a soil vapor extraction (SVE) pilot test in March 1995 to evaluate remedial options for <br /> the site Details of the SVE pilot test, as well as recommendations for soil and ground water <br /> remediation, were included in the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) dated 28 April 1995, prepared by <br /> AGE <br /> 3,4. PROCEDURES <br /> 3 1 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> On 25 January 1996, the-depth to ground water in each monitoring well was measured to the nearest <br /> 0 01 foot utilizing a Solist water level meter The relative ground water elevations were calculated <br /> by subtracting the depth to ground water from the relative casing elevations surveyed from a <br /> temporary benchmark(Table 1) Relative ground water elevations were plotted and contoured on a <br /> scaled site map (Figure 3) <br /> After water levels were measured, three well volumes of ground water were purged from each well <br /> approximately 3 gallons of water were removed from MW-1 utilizing a disposable polyethylene bailer <br /> and new nylon rope, approximately 50 to 70 gallons of ground water were removed from wells MW- <br /> 2, MW-3 and MW-4 utilizing a Grundfos Redi-Flo II submersible pump Temperature, pH and <br /> conductivity were measured at regular intervals from each well using an ICM model 52200 water <br /> analyzer Stabilization data and field logs are included with Appendix A Purged water was stored <br /> in 55-gallon drums and stored on-site in an area inaccessible to the general public <br /> 3 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> Monitoring wells MWA through MW-4 were allowed to recover for a minimum of one hour <br />. g g <br /> following purging, prior to sample collection Water samples were collected from MW-1 through <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.