Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 'E <br /> AWA restored the surface of the former well boring with a one-foot thick patch of ready-mix <br /> .E <br /> r concrete, dyed black to match the surrounding asphalt. p <br /> On December 5, 2008, on behalf of AWA, Ramage Environmental submitted well completion <br /> reports documenting the well destructions to the California Department of Water Resources <br /> (DWR). Copies of the well completion reports for the well destructions are included in Appendix <br /> E. <br /> 3.3 Disposal of Waste Well Materials and Soil <br /> I <br /> AWA contained the waste well materials and soil in two 55-Ballo``n drums for temporary on-site <br /> storage pending waste characterization and proper disposition.,I Following the well destructions <br /> on November 8, 2008, to characterize the waste material, Ramage Environmental collected one <br /> 'representative soil samples. Ramage Environmental transported the`soil sample with chain of- <br /> custody documentation to Kiff Analytical, LLC (Kiff), a state of California certified hazardous <br /> waste testing laboratory (Certification #2236). Kiff analyzed the sample for TPH-as-gasoline, <br /> BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 82601, and for total lead by EPA Method 6010B. <br /> I <br /> The soil sample only contained 3.7 milligrams per kilogram (mgl kg) of total lead. On December <br /> 1, 2008, based on the analytical results, EnviroPacific transported the two drums of waste well <br /> I materials and soil as non-hazardous waste to Redwood Landfill in Novato, California for disposal <br /> `i <br /> under Authorization #PC253. A copy of the non-hazardous soil transport document is included <br /> I in Appendix D, and the laboratory report is included in Appendix E. <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> s <br /> x <br /> i f <br /> 11 <br /> I. <br /> I IE <br />