Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC "*HEALTH SERV LCES <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY °' •boa <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br /> v: ya <br /> Ernest M. Fujimoto, M. D., M.P.H., Acting Health Officer <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor • Stockton, CA 9 <br /> 209/468-3420 0 <br /> CRAIG OGATA MAY 2 7 1997 <br /> DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES MANAGEMENT <br /> 222 E WEBER RM 675 <br /> STOCKTON CA 95202 <br /> RE: San Joaquin County contaminated sites <br /> On May 22, 1997, a meeting was held in the office of San Joaquin County Public <br /> Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) to discuss prioritizing <br /> the investigations and remedial activities at San Joaquin County sites. Mary <br /> Meays and Margaret Lagorio represented PHS/EHD and you represented the <br /> various San Joaquin County contaminated sites. The Airport at 5000 S. Airport <br /> Way, Stockton and the Human Services Building at 145 S. Sutter, Stockton were <br /> not included in this prioritization discussion. <br /> After discussion with those in charge of the Motor Pool site at 1810 E. Hazelton, <br /> Stockton, you will inform PHS/EHD if that site will be included in the site <br /> prioritization decisions. <br /> After completion of the boring required as part of the tank removal at the Canlis <br /> Building at 24 S. Hunter Street, Stockton, that site will be evaluated for closure or <br /> prioritized for further investigation and remediation. <br /> The underground storage tank removed in October 1996 from 999 Mathews <br /> Road, French Camp will reportedly be issued a closure letter by PHS/EHD. <br /> The following sites were given the following order of priority: <br /> 1. 503 E. Tenth Street, Tracy (Agricultural Commissioner's Office) <br /> 2. 392 S. Moffat Blvd., Manteca (Agricultural Commissioner's Office) <br /> 3. 222 E. Weber Ave., Stockton (Courthouse) <br /> 4. 130 N. Hunter Street, Stockton (Downtown Motor Pool) <br /> It was discussed that the definition of contamination in the soil and groundwater <br /> should be completed and evaluated at each site in order of priority, before <br /> starting the investigation of the next site. After the contamination at each site <br /> has been defined, remedial alternatives can be evaluated and the cost of <br /> remediation can be planned for in future budgets, as long as the contamination <br /> does not pose an immediate threat to human health or the environment. <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Health Care Services <br />