My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008228
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
222
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545869
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2020 10:51:59 AM
Creation date
7/21/2020 10:33:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008228
RECORD_ID
PR0545869
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003764
FACILITY_NAME
SJ COUNTY COURT HOUSE
STREET_NUMBER
222
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
14916001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
222 E WEBER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING, SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> On June 21, 2006, to comply with quarterly groundwater monitoring requirements, and to monitor <br /> the plume of impacted groundwater, Ramage Environmental monitored and sampled the three <br /> wells <br /> 21 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Depth-to-groundwater was monitored to within 0 01-foot using a water level indicator The static <br /> depth to the groundwater table, as measured in the three monitoring wells, ranged from 12 30 feet <br /> below grade in MW-1 to 24 42 feet below street grade in MW-3 The groundwater surface <br /> ' elevation in the three wells ranged from a high of 12 16 feet below mean sea level (msl) at MW-1 <br /> to a low of 12 86 feet below msl at MW-3 The resulting groundwater surface appears as a <br /> regular plane dipping to the northeast at a gradient of approximately 0 0083 foot/foot A <br /> groundwater surface contour map is included as Figure 4, the groundwater monitoring data are <br /> summarized in Table 3, and the sample information field sheets are included in Appendix A <br /> Between March 15, and June 21, 2006, the groundwater surface rose an average of 1 47 feet, the <br /> M groundwater gradient decreased from 0 0113 to 0 0083 foot/foot, and the groundwater flow <br /> direction remained toward the northeast During th'T quarter, the groundwater surface elevation <br /> was at its highest level, since the monitoring wells were installed in July 2002 Otherwise, these <br /> ' groundwater surface characteristics are consistent with historical and seasonal trends <br /> ' 22 Groundwater Sampling and Analysis <br /> Following groundwater level measurements, the wells were purged and sampled The wells were <br /> ipurged with a pump and dedicated disposable tubing until at least three well casing volumes had <br /> been removed and/or after groundwater temperature, pH and electrical conductivity values had <br /> stabilized Groundwater was sampled from the wells using disposable polyethylene bailers and <br /> laboratory-supplied containers Each sample container was transported in an iced cooler with <br /> chain-of-custody documentation to Excelchem Environmental Labs (Excelchem), a state of <br /> California certified hazardous waste testing laboratory (Certification #2119) Excelchem analyzed <br /> each groundwater sample for TPH-as-gasoline and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes <br /> (BTEX) by EPA Method 8021 B/8015M, and for MTBE, di-isopropyl ether (DIPS), ethyl tertiary <br /> butyl ether (ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary butanol (TBA), 1,2-dichloroethane <br /> (1,2-DCA), and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) by EPA Method 8260B <br /> r <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.