Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />! GREGG IN SITU, INC. ADVANCED GEO <br /> January 17, 2002 Manteca Corp Yard <br />! 02-500TX Manteca, Ca <br />! In situ groundwater samples were taken at three locations Groundwater samples were <br /> collected using a Hydropunch® type groundwater sampling system (figure 2) The <br /> groundwater sampler operates by pushing 1 75 inch diameter hollow rods with a <br />! retrievable tip A stainless steel filter screen is attached to the tip At the desired <br /> sampling depth, the rods are retracted exposing the filter screen and allowing for <br />! groundwater infiltration A small diameter bailer is then used to collect groundwater <br /> samples through the hollow rod <br />! Soil samples were taken using a piston type soil sampler (figure 3) The soil samples <br /> were collected in approximately 1 1/8 inch diameter stainless steel sample rings <br />! 3.0 CONE PENETRATION TEST DATA <br /> The cone penetration test data is presented in graphical form Penetration depths are <br />! referenced to existing ground surface This data includes CPT logs of measured soil <br /> parameters and a computer tabulation of interpreted soil types along with additional <br /> geotechnical parameters and pore pressure dissipation data <br />! The stratigraphic interpretation is based on relationships between cone bearing (qc), <br /> sleeve friction ft), and penetration pore pressure (U) The friction ratio (Rf), which is <br /> sleeve friction divided by cone bearing, is a calculated parameter which is used to infer <br />! soil behavior type Generally, cohesive soils (clays) have high friction ratios, low cone <br /> bearing and generate large excess pore water pressures Cohesionless soils (sands) <br />! have lower friction ratios, high cone bearing and generate little in the way of excess <br /> pore water pressures <br />! The interpretation of soils encountered on this project was carried out using recent <br /> correlations developed by Robertson et al, 1988 It should be noted that it is not always <br />! possible to clearly identify a soil type based on qc, ft and U In these situations, <br /> experience and judgement and an assessment of the pore pressure dissipation data <br /> should be used to infer the soil behavior type The soil <br />! <br />! <br />! <br />! <br />