Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Nuel Henderson I%W <br /> Re: 102 S. Wilson Way—Petition for Closure Page 4 <br /> These oxygenates [ETBE and TAME],particularly ETBE which is not <br /> known to be in current use in California, are much less likely to be found <br /> in water than MTBE... TAME is known to be in current use by one <br /> refinery in some of its reformulated gasoline at 2 percent TAME to 9 <br /> percent MTBE. <br /> As noted by the California Department of Health Services, ETBE was not used in <br /> California until after 1997, and TAME was in extremely limited use at that time and was <br /> only produced in connection with MTBE. <br /> The underground storage tanks were removed from the site 17 years before the writing of <br /> the above referenced document, making it unreasonable to conclude that the presence of <br /> ETBE and TAME is in any way attributable to an unauthorized release on the site. <br /> Furthermore, since monitoring on the site began, 96 percent of the wells registered <br /> increases of at least 100 percent for the presence of both ETBE and TAME contaminants. <br /> DIPE <br /> Di-isopropyl ether(DIPE) is an oxygenate used in the creation of reformulated gasoline. <br /> DIPE was not widely used as a gasoline additive until recent years. A federal interagency <br /> report commissioned by President Clinton, which examined the use of oxygenated fuels, <br /> was published in 1997 6 The report notes that at the time of publication, DIPE was in <br /> "limited commercial use." <br /> Because the oxygenate DIPE was in limited use in 1997, it is highly improbable that <br /> DIPE contaminants resulted from an unauthorized release occurring before 1978 when <br /> the underground storage tanks were removed. Therefore, it is unreasonable to conclude <br /> that the presence of DIPE is in any way attributable to an unauthorized release on the site. <br /> Furthermore, since monitoring on the site began, 92 percent of the wells have registered <br /> an increase of at least 100 percent for the presence of DIPE contaminants. <br /> Further Evidence of Contamination Oriewatinr from Other Site <br /> The very existence of the gasoline constituents noted above provides evidence that <br /> contaminants from an offsite source are migrating to the site of 102 S. Wilson Way. <br /> As additional verification of contaminant migration,consider the following: <br /> • Despite remediation activities at the site, 84 percent of the wells have showed an <br /> increase in TPHg of at least 100 times greater during the course of monitoring. In <br /> particular, 5 of the 6 vapor extraction wells show an increase in TPHg. One <br /> vapor extraction well which in 1998 indicated the presence of 37,000 parts per <br /> billion of TPHg,now shows that TPHg is present in the amount of 250,000 parts <br /> per billion. This clearly indicates that the vapor extraction is drawing in <br /> contaminants from the groundwater plume. <br /> s The report is available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/ostpfm.pdf <br />