My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
102
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545890
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2020 11:01:28 AM
Creation date
7/22/2020 10:49:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0545890
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0025958
FACILITY_NAME
ROEK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
102
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15502065
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
102 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Messrs Trommer and Larvon *M/ 19 June 2008 <br /> Preliminary Five-Year Review Letters Page 2 of 7 <br /> Various Sites <br /> chromium (CR*") in a number of the monitoring wells; the CR 16 was not related to <br /> the ozone injection of the pilot test. Approval for ORC has been put on hold <br /> pending and evaluation of the effect of ORC injection on aquifer quality. At this <br /> time a pilot test for SVE and insitu air sparging and a work plan to install a <br /> sentinel well to protect a nearby down-gradient domestic well have been <br /> approved. The EHD agrees with the general recommendation to implement <br /> active remediation to achieve WQOs in a timely manner. <br /> 102 Wilson Way, S. <br /> • The CUF recommended that the EHD direct the RP to assess alternative <br /> groundwater treatment technologies that might achieve WQOs more rapidly; the <br /> EHD agrees with this recommendation, but points out that this directive has been <br /> issued. The RP has also been under directive to evaluate and reactivate SVE if <br /> appropriate; the SVE unit on site has not been utilized since circa 2002. <br /> 101 Wilson Way, S. <br /> • The CUF recommended that the EHD direct the RP to assess the effectiveness <br /> of the current remediation systems and implement other technologies to achieve <br /> WQOs in a timely manner. The EHD agrees with this recommendation. A work <br /> plan to advance three soil borings to assess a source area and evaluate SVE <br /> effectiveness has recently been approved by the EHD; borings encountering <br /> significant soil contamination will be converted to SVE wells and plumbed into the <br /> SVE system. <br /> 814 Charter Way, E. <br /> • The CUF has recommended site closure consideration. The EHD does agree <br /> that this site is close to closure consideration; contaminant concentrations in <br /> most monitoring wells have dropped to low or non-detectable concentrations with <br /> the exception of monitoring well MW-108. Recent work has provided data to pass <br /> the vapor intrusion evaluation and the ESL comparison. Recently grab water <br /> samples have been collected to test the consultant's hypothesis that <br /> contaminants have migrated from an adjacent site (most likely 749 E. Charter <br /> Way) to impact MW-8. If the data supports the hypothesis the EHD will direct <br /> submittal of a site closure report. <br /> 701 Charter Way, E <br /> • The CUF agreed with the EHD directive to submit an interim remediation work <br /> plan and continue plume delineation toward the southeast. An interim <br /> remediation work plan is in preparation and is expected to be submitted within a <br /> week. The EHD agrees with the CUF recommendation. <br /> 3931 Newton Road <br /> • The CUF agreed with the EHD directive to evaluate remedial technologies for the <br /> site. <br /> 5-Year Review Comment Letter 061908.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.