Laserfiche WebLink
State Vrater Resources Contro'TBoard <br /> Division of Clean Water Programs <br /> Winston H.Hickox 2014 T Street•Sacramento,Califomia 95814•(916)2274518 <br /> Secretar}'j mor Mailing Address: P.O.Box 944212•Sacraento,California•94244.2120 <br /> G`iay Davis <br /> Environmental FAX(916)227.4530•Interne[Address: http://wwwswrcb.ca.gov/—cwphome/ustcf `(2'overnor <br /> Protection <br /> June 14, 2000 to <br /> Karen A. Collins Or Marla Nahom ?' <br /> Knowles Family 1993 Revocable Trust w ; <br /> 7574 Shoreline Dr w <br /> Stockton, CA 95219 <br /> PRE-APPROVAL OF CORRECTIVE ACTION COSTS, CLAIM NO. 007881, <br /> SITE ADDRESS: 102 WILSON WAY S, STOCKTON, CA 95205 <br /> I have reviewed your request,received on June 7,2000, for pre-approval of corrective action costs; I will <br /> place these documents in your file for future reference. I have included a copy of the"Cost Pre-Approval <br /> Request'form; please use this form in the future for requesting pre-approval of corrective action costs. <br /> With the following provisions,the total cost pre-approved as eligible for reimbursement for vapor wells <br /> rehabilitation approved by the San Joaquin County EHD (County) in their June 12, 2000 letter is$605. <br /> (The total amount approved for payment through request number 13.0 for work at your site that has been <br /> directed and approved by the County is $426,908.) <br /> Be aware that this pre-approval does not constitute a decision on reimbursement: all reasonable and <br /> necessary corrective action costs for work directed and approved by the County will be eligible for <br /> reimbursement per the terms of your Letter of Commitment at costs consistent with those pre-approved in <br /> this letter. <br /> All future costs for corrective action must be approved in writing by Fund staff. <br /> Future costs for corrective action must meet the requirements of <br /> Article 11, Chapter 16, Underground Storage Tank Regulations. <br /> • The actual costs and scope of work performed must be consistent with the pre-approval for it to <br /> remain valid. <br /> • The work products must be acceptable to the County and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. <br /> • If a different scope of work becomes necessary,then you must request pre-approval of costs on the <br /> new scope of work. <br /> • Although I have referred to the Ground Zero Analysis, Inc. proposal in my pre-approval above, please <br /> be aware that you will be entering into a private contract: the State of California cannot compel you <br /> to sign any specific contract. This letter pre-approves the costs as presented in the proposal dated <br /> June 7,2000 by Ground Zero Analysis, Inc. for conducting the work approved by the County. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> P�14 Recycled Paper <br />