My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS_FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
102
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545890
>
WORK PLANS_FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2020 10:55:34 AM
Creation date
7/22/2020 10:52:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0545890
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0025958
FACILITY_NAME
ROEK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
102
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15502065
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
102 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Rebecca E. Setliff <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> Monitoring Well Placement <br /> Ground Zero disagrees with EHD's recommendation to move the location of monitoring well <br /> cluster MW15A-C toward the west. The well location proposed in the October 31, 2001 <br /> Workplan was intended to complete the definition of the downgradient extent of groundwater <br /> contamination originating from the release at 102 S. Wilson Way. " Ground Zero is unable to <br /> understand why it would be advantageous to construct the proposed monitoring well cluster <br /> within the estimated limits of the plume. According to our interpretation of the downgradient <br /> extent of contamination (see Figures 4 and 5, Workplan for Additional Site Activities, 10/31/01) <br /> at EHD's proposed location MW 15A and MW 15B would almost certainly be contaminated. If <br /> this were to be the case, additional downgradient wells would then be required. We also do not <br /> see the benefit of constructing deep wells at this time near the locations of current wells MW 12 <br /> and MW13. Monitoring well MW13 is within the heart of the plume of contamination and this <br /> fact does not need verification with additional wells. By itself, the proposed MW 15 cluster <br /> should adequately define the downgradient limits of the plume and another downgradient <br /> monitoring point near MW12 may prove unnecessary. <br /> Mud rotary drilling necessitates a larger footprint for the drilling and mud system equipment than <br /> does hollow stem auger work. Since the obstructions (trees and overhead lines) along the south <br /> side of Market Street likely will not accommodate the equipment, we recommend moving the <br /> location of the well cluster to the east side of the building as shown on Figure 2. We recommend <br /> conducting several quarters of sampling in order to confirm analytical results prior to evaluating <br /> the need for any additional wells. If the data indicate that plume definition is incomplete, <br /> additional wells will be proposed <br /> Sample Collection and Analysis <br /> Soil samples from borings drilled with hollow stem augers will be collected and analyzed as <br /> described in the October 31, 2001 Workplan. Due to the mud rotary drilling method, we do not <br /> expect to collect undisturbed soil samples for laboratory analysis from MW15C. Stratigraphy of <br /> the boring will be determined by logging the cuttings. <br /> Well Development, Surveying and Groundwater Sampling <br /> All new monitoring wells will be developed, surveyed and sampled as described in the October 31, <br /> 2001 Workplan. <br /> Evaluation of Ozone Injection <br /> Ground Zero will research and evaluate ozone injection as a potential remedy. Although we are <br /> conceptually familiar with the method, we have no applied experience. It would be helpful if <br /> EHD would identify to us example sites located in San Joaquin County where ozone injection has <br /> been successful. We hope to review the files in order to evaluate the specifics of the technique <br /> prior to proposing and designing a pilot test. <br /> Roek\c1osure\workp1m\addendum.dm <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.