My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS_FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
102
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545890
>
WORK PLANS_FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2020 10:55:34 AM
Creation date
7/22/2020 10:52:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0545890
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0025958
FACILITY_NAME
ROEK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
102
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15502065
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
102 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Margaret Lagorio <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> FEASIBILITY OF ADDITIONAL SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION <br /> In the letter dated July 20 PHS/EHD directed that the vapor extraction system remain at the site <br /> and the feasibility of additional vapor extraction in the area of confirmation boring CB3 and old <br /> soil boring TB5 be investigated. <br /> In our May 18, 2001 Confirmation Boring and Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation <br /> Report we concluded that soil vapor extraction had succeeded in remediating vadose soil <br /> contamination to the point at which further operation of the system was not justifiable. The <br /> system has removed approximately 12,700 pounds of hydrocarbons from the subsurface. Vadose <br /> soil samples collected from within the former area of impact were all non-detect for TPHg and <br /> benzene in confirmation borings CB 1, CB2 and CB4. Only in confirmation boring CB3 was any <br /> residual vadose soil impact identified. In those samples, benzene was not detected and the <br /> chromatogram indicated that the lighter, more volatile gasoline components were absent. The <br /> samples were collected from a low-permeability silty clay. We reiterate that the hydrocarbons <br /> remaining in the vicinity of CB3 do not contain appreciable levels of toxic compounds and are not <br /> amenable to vapor extraction. The laboratory narrative and chromatograms 'for the samples in <br /> question are included in Attachment A. The locations of the confirmation borings are shown on <br /> Figure 6. <br /> Vadose soil contamination was identified in boring TB5 in 1989. However, although elevated <br /> levels of TPHg were present between the depths of 5 and 25 feet the highest benzene <br /> concentration was only 0.008 ppm and in the sample with the highest TPHg concentration <br /> benzene was not detected. The soil contamination in boring TB5 had a very low toxic <br /> component. <br /> Boring T135 was apparently located at the edge of the area of soil contamination or may have <br /> sampled a very localized impact from dispensers. Boring TB5 was offset by the following <br /> borings: <br /> TB4: Located about 10 feet southwest of TB5. Soil samples between the depths of 5 <br /> and 20 feet were non-detect for TPHg and BTEX. <br /> MWl: Located about 5 feet northwest of TB5. No odors or soil discoloration was <br /> observed when drilling. One sample was analyzed and was non-detect for TPHg and <br /> BTEX. <br /> SB22: Located about 7 feet northeast of T135. The highest concentration of TPHg was <br /> 17 ppm with 0.160 ppm benzene at 15 ft. <br /> SB21 (MW6): Located about 9 feet south of TB5. Samples from 10, 20 and 30 feet were <br /> all non-detect for TPHg. Benzene was present at 30 feet at 0.004 ppm. <br /> roek\closure\workplao4esponsa.doe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.