Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Ron Rowe <br /> Page 3 <br /> MW4 at concentrations of 19 and 85 parts per billion (ppb), respectively DIPE was detected <br /> in the samples from wells MW3 (1 1 ppb), MW11 (Ilppb), and MW12 (1 9ppb) TBA was <br /> detected in all the samples, except from MW13, at concentrations ranging from 8 2 to 49 ppb <br /> ETBE and TAME were not detected in any samples The oxygenate concentrations are <br /> summarized in Table 3 <br /> Groundwater Sampling Summary <br /> MTBE was detected in well MW4 for the third consecutive quarter However, concentrations <br /> have shown a decreasing trend during that period MTBE was also detected in well MW3, <br /> located downgradient of MW4, for the first time Dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations in <br /> samples from well MW4 have decreased to near historical levels after two consecutive quarters <br /> of increased concentrations. Contaminant concentrations present in well MW4 do not appear <br /> to be related to onsite releases due to the lack of MTBE in other site wells and the consistent <br /> east-southeast groundwater flow direction In addition, the appearance of MTBE in MW3 and <br /> decrease of MTBE in MW4 suggest that an off site plume may be migrating southeastward <br /> across the site <br /> After the third quarter of oxygenate analysis, the only apparent trends are the presence of MTBE <br /> in well MW4, the presence of DIPE in well JAW11, and the presence of TBA in well MW12 <br /> However, the presence of DIPS and TBA in groundwater at this site seems unusual based on <br /> the letter from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region dated August <br /> 1997 The letter suggests that in San Joaquin County DIPE has only recently been detected in <br /> groundwater and that TBA has only been detected at one location <br /> VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM ACTIVITIES <br /> VES Operation <br /> The soil vapor extraction system operated on vapor wells VW2, VW3, VW5, and VW6 for a <br /> total of 1,512 hours between April 1 and June 30, 1998 <br /> The VES shut down on Apnl 21, 1998 as a result of a tripped thermal overload switch The <br /> system was restarted and placed back in full time operation on May 11, 1998 The system also <br /> shut down on June 15 and 20, and was restarted after each occasion The system apparently <br /> shut down as a result of temperature fluctuations <br /> During the quarter, the VES was monitored on a weekly basis The systems monitoring data <br /> sheets are included in Attachment C On April 13, May 18, and June 15 influent and effluent <br /> vapor samples were collected and submitted to Sequoia Analytical for analysis The samples <br /> were analyzed for total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPPH) and BTEX <br /> • <br /> rc:klaznrl2crni S98 <br /> F <br />