Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Ron Rowe <br /> Page 5 <br /> The VES has removed a significant mass of contamination from accessible vadose soils since <br /> ' operation began in November 1997 During this period approximately 11,500 pounds of <br /> hydrocarbons have been removed from the subsurface The estimated total mass of soil <br /> contaminants prior to instituting vapor extraction was approximately 24,000 pounds, suggesting that <br /> ' approximately 50% of the total has been removed The remaining 50% is comprised for the most <br /> part of contaminated soil which is currently submerged due to high water levels This is not <br /> expected to become accessible to the VES for several years, if at all As discussed in the previous <br /> ' quarterly report, air sparging does not appear to be a viable technique for dealing with the saturated <br /> soil contamination Influent vapor concentrations to the VES are approaching asymptotic levels <br /> ' and water levels continue to rise and are threatening to submerge the screen in yet another vapor <br /> well We recommend that a cost/benefit analysis be conducted in the near future to provide <br /> guidance as to the point at which soil vapor extraction should cease <br /> Despite the rising water levels which have submerged many of the screens in the groundwater <br /> monitoring wells, it is abundantly clear that the plume of dissolved hydrocarbon contamination is <br /> stable The exception is the increasing concentrations of dissolved gasoline and MTBE beneath the <br /> southern portion of the property As discussed previously in this report, the source of this <br /> commingled contamination is offsite and most likely the adjacent ARCO facility Any additional <br /> efforts to define the limits and nature of increasing or migrating contamination should be borne by <br /> the party responsible for its release <br /> ' Pending development and agreement on the criteria and schedule for case closure we recommend <br /> the following <br /> ' VES Operation <br /> Based on estimated carbon usage Ground Zero recommends continuing with the thermal oxidizer as <br /> ' the more cost-effective offgas treatment method, even though the vapor extraction system efficiency <br /> appears to be approaching the asymptotic limit for hydrocarbon removal We recommend <br /> monitoring the VES on a weekly schedule and collecting vapor samples for laboratory analysis on <br /> ' a monthly basis <br /> QuarterIy Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br /> ' Ground Zero recommends continuing quarterly sampling to monitor the extent of gasoline <br /> hydrocarbons in groundwater Analysis for oxygenates should continue for wells MW1, MW3, <br /> MW4, MW 11, MW 12, and MW 13 for next quarter It would also be advisable to analyze samples <br /> ' from well MW7 for oxygenates due to its position downgradient of MTBE impacted wells MW3 <br /> and MW4 The next groundwater sampling event is scheduled for May 1999 Your office will be <br /> ' provided with 48-hours notice of any field work <br /> 1mk%q=\1 qmi 999 <br />