Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> 1 <br /> ' Mr Ron Rowe <br /> Page 3 <br /> located east of MW4, for the second consecutive quarter Dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations <br /> in samples from well MW4 have increased to the middle of the recent historic range after one <br /> ' quarter of decreased concentrations. Contaminant concentrations present in well MW4 (and <br /> perhaps MW3) do not appear to be related entirely to onsite releases due to the presence of <br /> MTBE in these wells, the period of UST use/removal on the property and the easterly <br /> groundwater flow direction The recent appearance of MTBE in MW3 and increase of MTBE <br /> in MW4, corresponding to an increase in gasoline hydrocarbon concentrations in MW3 and <br /> 1 1 MW4, suggests that a plume originating offsite may be migrating eastward across the site It <br /> is suspected that the Top Filling Station at 101 S. Wilson Way, the ARCO Station at 130 S. <br /> Wilson Way, or both may be the source of this encroaching contamination <br /> ' After the fourth quarter of oxygenate analysis, the only apparent consistencies are the presence <br /> of MTBE in wells MW3 and MW4, the presence of DIPE in wells MW11, and MW12 and the <br /> ' presence of TBA in wells MW 1, MW3, MW4, MW 11 and MW 12 ETBE and TAME were not <br /> detected in any samples <br /> ' Hydrocarbon concentrations in several wells have exhibited an overall trend of decrease since <br /> 1995196. Some of these wells, however, have had their screens submerged for a year or more <br /> Importantly, wells MW2 and MW 13 are constructed such that the tops of their screens remain <br /> above the water table. These wells are generally downgradient of the onsite contaminant source <br /> and both have shown a trend of decreasing concentrations, particularly MW2 The operation <br /> of the soil vapor extraction system, along with natural attenuation, may be asserting a <br /> ' measurably positive influence on dissolved contaminant concentrations <br /> VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM ACTIVITIES <br /> ' VES Operation <br /> The soil vapor extraction system operated for a total of 612 hours between June 28 and <br /> ' September 14, 1998 During this period an estimated 1,600 pounds of hydrocarbons were <br /> removed from the subsurface. Vapor wells were VW2, VW3, VW5 and VW6 were all online <br /> until August 25 when VW3 was taken offline due to high groundwater levels which had <br /> 1 submerged the screen <br /> System operation was very erratic during the quarter with a tendency to operate for a matter of <br /> ' days or hours and then automatically shut down "Air Flow Error" was generally indicated on <br /> the combustion control system Additionally, the thermal overload circuit would often be <br /> ' tripped The manufacturer's representative suggested several possible faults causing this <br /> problem malfunctioning digital flow transmitter, malfunctioning air pressure switch transmitter, <br /> current overload to the blower motor and high ambient air temperature exacerbating the <br /> ' foregoing New components were installed and a current overload situation apparently rectified <br /> raeklgmr13gm1998 dao <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />