Laserfiche WebLink
" Mr. Nuel Henderson <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> During this event an upward vertical gradient component was present across the site. Wells <br /> screened deeper than 60 feet had higher potentiometric surface elevations than shallower wells <br /> in close proximity. Examples are well pairs 1V1Wl/MW6, MW3/MW7, MW15A/MW15B, <br /> MW16A/MW16B, and ARCO well pairs MW7/MW9 and MW8/MW10. A potentiometric <br /> surface map generated using the December 8, 2005 groundwater elevation data for most <br /> groundwater monitoring wells, regardless of screen depth, is shown on Figure 2. Figure 3 <br /> utilizes data from the shallower wells only (screened above 60 feet). The potentiometric <br /> surface computed from the deeper wells only (screened below 60 feet) is depicted on Figure 4. <br /> Groundwater gradient in each interpretation is toward the northeast at approximately 0.001 - <br /> 0.002 feet per foot. Groundwater monitoring data are summarized in Table 1. Monitoring <br /> data sheets and well construction details are included in Attachment B. <br /> On December 21 and 22, 2005, a Ground Zero technician collected groundwater samples from <br /> monitoring wells MW 1, MW7, MW8, MW 11, MW12, MW 13B, MW15A, MW 15B, <br /> MW15C, and VWL <br /> I <br /> A minimum of three well casing volumes was purged from each well prior to sampling. <br /> During the purging process, physical parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature) <br /> were monitored. Subsequent to parameter stabilization, and 98% recovery of initial depth to <br /> groundwater measurements, groundwater samples were collected and placed in an iced cooler <br /> for transport to Argon Laboratories (FLAP #2359) under chain of custody protocol. <br /> Analysis consisted of gasoline oxygenates, EDB and 1,2-DCA by EPA Method 8260B, TPHg <br /> by EPA Method 8015M and BTEX by EPA Method 8021B. Purge water was transferred into <br /> labeled 55-gallon drums approved by the Department of Transportation (DOT). The waste is <br /> stored onsite within a secured area. Purge logs are included in Attachment B. <br /> GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Wells <br /> TPHg and benzene were not detected in wells MW7, MW11, MW12, MW15A, MW15B and <br /> MW15C. TPHg was detected in well MW1 at a concentration of 200 parts per billion (ppb). <br /> No BTEX compounds were detected in MWL TPHg and benzene were detected in well MW8 <br /> at concentrations of 650 ppb and 31 ppb, respectively. TPHg and benzene were detected in <br /> well MW13B at concentrations of 60,000 ppb and 5,200 ppb, respectively. Dissolved TPHg <br /> and BTEX levels were within historical ranges, and appear to be stable to decreasing. TPHg <br /> and BTEX concentration data are summarized in Table 2. Attachment C contains laboratory <br /> reports and chain of custody documentation. <br /> MTBE was not detected in wells MW8, MW13B and MW15C. MTBE was detected in wells <br /> MW1 (6.4 ppb), MW7 (110 ppb), MW11 (260 ppb), MW12 (390 ppb), MW15A (7.5 ppb), <br /> G:\GROUN[)ZLIROEKIQMR1200514gm2005.doe <br />