Laserfiche WebLink
' Mr. Nuel Henderson <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> ' through MW13B, MW15B, MW15C, MW16B and or well <br /> vapor wells VW1 and VW4. Va <br /> • P P <br /> VW5 was dry. <br /> During this event an upward vertical gradient component was present across the site. Wells <br /> ' screened deeper than 60 feet had higher potentiometric surface elevations than shallower wells <br /> in close proximity. Examples are well pairs MW1/MW6, MW3/MW7, MWI5AIMW15B and <br /> MW16A/MW16B. A potentiometric surface map generated using the August 17, 2005 <br /> ' groundwater elevation data for most groundwater monitoring wells, regardless of screen depth, <br /> is shown on Figure 2. The gradient across the site according to this interpretation was <br /> approximately 0.002-0.005 feet per foot in a northeasterly direction. Figure 3 is a gradient <br /> ' map utilizing data from the shallower wells only (screened above 60 feet). Gradient is <br /> approximately 0.002 ft/ft in a,easterly direction. The gradient computed from the deeper wells <br /> only (screened below 60 feet) ranges from approximately 0.002 - 0.004 ft/ft. Flow direction <br /> ' in the deeper zone is towards the northeast (Figure 4). Groundwater monitoring data are <br /> summarized in Table 1. Monitoring data sheets and well construction details are included in <br /> Attachment A. <br /> tOn August 18, 2005, a Ground Zero technician collectedsam roundwater les from <br /> g P <br /> ' monitoring wells MW1, MW8, MW11, MW12, MW13B, MW15A, MW15B, MW15C, and <br /> VW1. <br /> A minimum of three well casing volumes was purged from each well prior to sampling. <br /> During the purging process, physical parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature) <br /> were monitored. Subsequent to parameter stabilization, and 100% recovery of initial depth to <br /> ' groundwater measurements, groundwater samples were collected and placed in an iced cooler <br /> for transport to Argon Laboratories (FLAP #2359) under chain of custody protocol. <br /> ' Analysis consisted of gasoline oxygenates, EDB and 1,2-DCA by EPA Method 826013, TPHg <br /> by EPA Method 8015M and BTEX by EPA Method 8021B. Purge water was transferred into <br /> labeled 55-gallon drums approved by the Department of Transportation (DOT). The waste is <br /> stored onsite within a secured area. Purge logs are included in Attachment A. <br /> ' GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Wells <br /> ' <br /> TPHg and benzene were not detected in wells MW 11, MW 12, MW 15A, MW15B and <br /> MW15C. TPHg was detected in well MW1 at a concentration of 180 parts per billion (ppb). <br /> No BTEX compounds were detected in MW 1. TPHg and benzene were detected in well MW8 <br /> at concentrations of 1,300 ppb and 67 ppb, respectively. TPHg and benzene were detected in <br /> ' well MW13B at concentrations of 140,000 ppb and 9,300 ppb, respectively. Dissolved TPHg <br /> and BTEX levels were within historical ranges, and appear to be stable to decreasing. TPHg <br /> . and BTEX concentration data are summarized in Table 2, Attachment B contains laboratory <br /> G:\GkOUNVZE\RQ YC QMR12U0513gm2Oo1 .doe <br />